Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Feminists

wendyb-NC

(3,971 posts)

5. Augh!

Reply to Soph0571 (Original post)

Wed Oct 6, 2021, 06:14 AM

Oct 2021

Why is he in the position that he holds? He's practicing misogyny as he speaks. The GQP, over here, in the USA, is pretty much in sync, they do all they can to control what and how women pursue rights and freedom in our democracy.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Twitter is amused, I am not [View all] Soph0571 Oct 2021 OP

A "woman against a man" would be misandry, not misogyny. sop Oct 2021 #1

It does exist, though likely quite rare bucolic_frolic Oct 2021 #9

Since women do not have the systematic power as men do, it really does not exist. LizBeth Oct 2021 #12

and the closest cross-gender term might have been to just say "sexism." n/t thesquanderer Oct 2021 #11

We can't fix stupid but we certainly don't have to elect it to office! nt abqtommy Oct 2021 #2

Hear Hear! (n/t) OldBaldy1701E Oct 2021 #6

Sounds like 45 disease is now in GB. marble falls Oct 2021 #3

Like the OP states: it's intentional what-about-ism Alice Kramden Oct 2021 #4

Augh! wendyb-NC Oct 2021 #5

Inigo knows... markbark Oct 2021 #7

We laugh at the stupidity but it is a serious issue. tetedur Oct 2021 #8

We are not amused. We are appalled, but unsurprised. niyad Oct 2021 #10

This message was self-deleted by its author jfz9580m Oct 2021 #13