Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

littlemissmartypants

(29,752 posts)
43. The rich don't need too many hospitals. They have boutique medicine.
Thu Jun 19, 2025, 01:18 PM
Jun 2025

And it's not just the hospitals. It's a domino effect.
Employees...
Vendors...
Local businesses...
Tax revenue...
Etc...

Hospitals are often the main employers in a population area. Bankrupt them and the entire town could fall.


Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Bribing MAGAts to re-elect them. no_hypocrisy Jun 2025 #1
Is it though? gab13by13 Jun 2025 #3
What good is the hospital if the person no longer has Medicaid? mdbl Jun 2025 #18
Yeah hildegaard28 Jun 2025 #21
Republicans are so bad at business. travelingthrulife Jun 2025 #27
keeping hospitals open, while unavailable to everyone due to insurance? rampartd Jun 2025 #24
So this fund for rural hospitals gab13by13 Jun 2025 #2
"I assume it will only be used in red states?" BumRushDaShow Jun 2025 #7
A lot of that empty land doesn't vote. travelingthrulife Jun 2025 #28
I know BumRushDaShow Jun 2025 #39
Maybe I'm being overly simplistic, boonecreek Jun 2025 #4
No, not overly simplistic . . . but it might displease President Enraged Baby Huey . . . hatrack Jun 2025 #9
I totally agree, boonecreek. That's the first thing I thought of when I read this original post. wordstroken Jun 2025 #15
And hildegaard28 Jun 2025 #22
We have to be cruel and heartless first. Irish_Dem Jun 2025 #35
The point is to kill off blue populations and bronxiteforever Jun 2025 #37
But also remember BumRushDaShow Jun 2025 #41
Tax us more to screw the poor. delisen Jun 2025 #5
Wouldn't it be more efficient to just fund Medicaid so the hospitals can do their job? Eugene Jun 2025 #6
I am on Medicare gab13by13 Jun 2025 #10
That's logical, but......................... Lovie777 Jun 2025 #12
This message was self-deleted by its author surfered Jun 2025 #8
defunding enid602 Jun 2025 #11
Uhhh bagimin Jun 2025 #14
GOP Plans to fix problem they are about to create BOSSHOG Jun 2025 #13
Hospitals nobody can afford to go to... Hugin Jun 2025 #16
Another fix to a TSF generated problem. Just like billions to farmers sinkingfeeling Jun 2025 #17
Mindless Fucks Canada Kid Jun 2025 #19
Or they hildegaard28 Jun 2025 #20
SO let me get this straight they are going to rob Peter to pay Paul............... turbinetree Jun 2025 #23
Here's a thought. You wouldn't have to do a bailout if you would just leave Medicaid alone. Baitball Blogger Jun 2025 #25
"Eyeing a bailout" after stealing medicaid money for oligarchs is one thing. Actually doing it is another. IF they do, ancianita Jun 2025 #26
Correction bailout to the venture capitalist groups who are bankrupting those hospitals JT45242 Jun 2025 #29
Turning a deliberative funding mechanism into a personal extortion racket Prairie Gates Jun 2025 #30
Think about this. They want to offset the money they save from cutting people off.... JohnnyRingo Jun 2025 #31
Blue states subsidizing red states is the plan Mysterian Jun 2025 #32
Didn't really think that out did they? underpants Jun 2025 #33
Jesus Christ no! JustAnotherGen Jun 2025 #34
Oh, my god nowforever Jun 2025 #36
Because not cutting Medicaid is just too simple sakabatou Jun 2025 #38
anything that gives to red states stillcool Jun 2025 #40
Stupid. Just like firing hundreds of essential federal personnel and then hiring them back. To save money? Martin68 Jun 2025 #42
The rich don't need too many hospitals. They have boutique medicine. littlemissmartypants Jun 2025 #43
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»GOP eyes bailout for hosp...»Reply #43