Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

angrychair

(10,709 posts)
1. Be warned
Thu May 8, 2025, 09:08 PM
May 8

So, as I understand it, the whole "DEI" thing is bad to this administration and they want a meritocracy style approach to hiring and promotions. Apparently the only place this isn't true is the military. Because if it were true then trans members of the military would be evaluated on the merits of their service record and reviews by their unit leader. If they truly cared about only hiring and promoting the best people then why doesn't that apply to trans members of the military? More importantly, are these people not human beings and citizens of the United States? Why are their rights different? If there is no "DEI" then why are they being singled out for different treatment than others? And you have to ask: Why would they stop there? Can they decide that only Christians can be in the military? Or only straight people are allowed to be in the military? Or only white people are allowed to be in the military? Or only men are allowed to be in the military?
See where I'm going here? What if they decide only Christian, straight, white men are allowed in the military? How, specifically, is that any different than banning trans people? Logically there is no difference. The same core argument could be made in each of the examples given because their argument is bullshit.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Hegseth initiates ban on ...»Reply #1