Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Silent Type

(10,113 posts)
2. The company he worked for was penalized $ 600+ million. Medicare fraud convictions require proving
Mon May 12, 2025, 11:59 PM
May 12

the defendants knew — or should have known — what they were doing was wrong. That’s hard to do, unfortunately. If government found evidence Scott directed staff to act fraudulently, that would have helped.

It’s much easier to file civil actions rather than criminal charges. You still get money back, plus interest, and perhaps some penalties in settlement than convicting people of knowingly ripping off Medicare. It does happen, but usually when there is evidence of direct involvement in fraudulent acts.

I’m not saying that’s OK, but it’s the way it often works out even in non-healthcare cases.

Recommendations

8 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why wasn't Rick Scott pro...»Reply #2