Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "I think that's over." Gen. McCaffrey on NATO [View all]Kid Berwyn
(19,205 posts)46. An accurate epitaph of evil.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5e8e3/5e8e3ed7f3711e1b8138145181cea0234e9e344a" alt=""
"What kind of psychopath poses with an infant whose parents were killed?"
It is the sort of photo politicians have long been known to favour: adorable baby, thumbs up, big smiles.
Few, however, would surely pose this way in such grave circumstances.
Donald Trump has sparked global revulsion after being photographed grinning with a two-month-old child who was made an orphan during Saturdays mass shooting in El Paso which left 22 people dead.
The infants adopted parents, Andre and Jordan Anchondo, were both killed in the supermarket massacre, while he himself suffered broken bones when Ms Anchondo fell on the child to shield him from further bullets.
But when the baby, called Paul, was brought to the US president at the University Medical Center of El Paso, the 73-year-old appeared untouched by the childs tragic plight. Both he and first lady Melania smiled for cameras, while the commander-in-chief also threw in a thumbs up.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/trump-melania-baby-el-paso-thumbs-up-hospital-parents-mass-shooting-a9049086.html
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3f819/3f8191082cc674ff344b9d9427f285897071fb3f" alt=""
This article (wondering about Turkey, in 2019) says there would have to be a material breach of the treaty
muriel_volestrangler
Thursday
#4
"Palling around with dictators" is what $arah Palin accused Obama of doing. Projection.
OMGWTF
Thursday
#9
Grassroots are gonna decide over the next four years if will remain free or not.
Magoo48
Thursday
#17
You have more faith in the average soldier understanding the nuances of orders from his/her CIC
Arazi
Thursday
#19
Yes Yes! There nothing more stabilization then have most of the world terrified of what-the-fuck.
chouchou
Thursday
#14
Agree...NATO will survive without the US. Putin will not be successful going up against a United EU
PortTack
Thursday
#21
May have started. After calling for Ukraine surrender, Kellogg pulls 180...
Kid Berwyn
Yesterday
#49
I guess we could say US foreign policy is currently incoherent, in flux, or just plain
Martin68
22 hrs ago
#54