Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Statement from Vice President Kamala Harris on the Equal Rights Amendment [View all]
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,462 posts)47. You said
four hours ago that you were going to out me on ignore…why don’t you do so, then you won’t have to worry about seeing posts with which you disagree.
I have the right to state my opinion every bit as much as you do, and I will continue to do so.
If you don’t like that, then again, I suggest you put me on ignore.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
60 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Statement from Vice President Kamala Harris on the Equal Rights Amendment [View all]
Quiet Em
14 hrs ago
OP
If it's now established as the "law of the land" , when does it go into effect?
MichMan
13 hrs ago
#2
Well, I have more respect for Laurence Tribe than any other constitutional lawyer and he says you are wrong:
hlthe2b
12 hrs ago
#10
I loved RBG but she is no longer relevant, having not heard the argument that Tribe presents.
hlthe2b
12 hrs ago
#14
She did not live to hear it litigated. She was a tremendous SCOTUS justice, but not a constitutional scholar/litigant
hlthe2b
12 hrs ago
#18
that you diminish Laurence Tribe says all I want to hear from you. I said she was not a constitutional scholar litigant.
hlthe2b
12 hrs ago
#26
Can you read? I said RBG was not a constiutional scholar litigant. She was not. She was a wonderful SCOTUS justice
hlthe2b
12 hrs ago
#31
Not a single one remotely related to ERA or abortion or anything related. Tribe, on the other hand has argued 36
hlthe2b
12 hrs ago
#38
Your willingness to devote this much energy into promoting the meme the RW has advanced since VA's vote
hlthe2b
8 hrs ago
#45
Being called on your posts, attitudes and disgusting disregard for the rights of others struck a nerve, did it?
hlthe2b
8 hrs ago
#48
You said it was settled. I have at no time said it should not be litigated, just as Tribe has made the case.
hlthe2b
8 hrs ago
#51
Tribe and Sullivan conveniently ignore the current makeup of the Supreme Court.
progressoid
7 hrs ago
#60
According to the Associated Press and Boston Globe, the 1982 deadline for it to be ratified has passed.
TheRickles
13 hrs ago
#6
AP writers/editors are not constitutional lawyers. Hell they are hardly reporters. See Laurence Tribe on this
hlthe2b
12 hrs ago
#11
I submitted this AP story before Tribe's commentary was released. I'll defer to him. :-)
TheRickles
11 hrs ago
#44
There is a strong legal argument that the deadline itself was unconstituional
Wiz Imp
12 hrs ago
#25
I said elsewhere that Biden's action should be celebrated even if it doesn't hold
Wiz Imp
12 hrs ago
#35
Oh, so NOW you agree there is a case to be made and should be settled via litigation. After what, two dozen posts
hlthe2b
8 hrs ago
#46
Not to me, you haven't. Only a constant stream of memes about it being settled, Tribe has no case to make, etc. etc.
hlthe2b
8 hrs ago
#52
Proving once again you never read Tribe's argument given you spiel the meme about the date when there is
hlthe2b
8 hrs ago
#56
Yes. I keep posting Laurence Tribe's assessment of this (that it is now law) and they keep poo pooing HIM!
hlthe2b
12 hrs ago
#12
Unbelievable how many people are upset that the ERA is now the law of the land.
Quiet Em
12 hrs ago
#19
I don't think anyone here is upset, I think we're realistic about what this means
EdmondDantes_
12 hrs ago
#29
You have not even bothered to read constiutional scholar Laurence Tribe's argument that defeats yours.
hlthe2b
12 hrs ago
#21