Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

WSHazel

(409 posts)
1. Many of these anti-AI stories
Tue May 13, 2025, 05:35 AM
May 13

Are done by people who don’t understand AI. For example, there have been coding tools for many years that can pre-populate blocks of code. Why wouldn’t coders be taught using those tools?

In writing, there have been plagiarism detection software in the market for probably 20 years. Since current LLM AI is essentially a full text search engine, if it writes a paper, it is likely plagiarizing the work of others. These existing plagiarism detection tools, which are likely enhanced by AI now, will not only be very effective at identifying plagiarized writing, but should be able to cite the plagiarized content.

While the difference is subtle, current AI is not as good at creating content as it is at evaluating content. In other words, professors, if they bother to learn how to use AI, should have the advantage.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Cable News Clips»Growing number of college...»Reply #1