Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Cable News Clips

brush

(58,733 posts)

2. Was just policy, not codified. Is now thanks to SCOTUS.

Reply to Rhiannon12866 (Original post)

Wed Nov 6, 2024, 07:57 PM

Nov 2024

What are they talking about? That policy has already been disregarded as the cases have already been brought...the J6 one and the Manhattan DA one, a state charge. Both happened before the SCOTUS immunity ruling and IMO were not "oficial acts." One being trying to overthrow the government and the other paying off a porn star way before he was president.

Is Lisa Rubin correct on this?

And old Garland, very slow on proceeding on the J6 crime, is not wasting any time to get rid of these cases.

Is he a mole?

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Rhiannon12866 Rhiannon12866

2 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Weissmann: 'You cannot charge and prosecute a sitting president' according to DOJ policy - MSNBC Reports [View all] Rhiannon12866 Nov 2024 OP

Not sittimg but bullshitting President. GreenWave Nov 2024 #1

Was just policy, not codified. Is now thanks to SCOTUS. brush Nov 2024 #2