Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

merrily

(45,251 posts)
8. You don't often raise the floor without lowering the ceiling. It's a matter of speed and degree.
Sun Jul 26, 2015, 08:39 AM
Jul 2015

Bernie and, I think, only Bernie--among the top 3 candidates anyway-- talks of wealth inequality as well as income inequality.

As to income inequality, in reality, you can dust off your palms after you raise the minimum wage to wherever you think it should be: Apart from government employees, the private sector determines income levels. Still, even the minimum wage moves money from someone to someone else. Perhaps from the wrong someones, in the case of struggling small businesses, though laws usually exempt the smallest businesses.

Addressing wealth inequality, however, is different.

I must state, however, that many owners of small businesses are not businessmen, but businesswomen. And I have a similar object to "patrimonial."

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I don't speak for DSUSA, but rogerashton Jul 2015 #1
Thank you for that thoughtful post. Right now, the crushing of the middle class and the ignoring of merrily Jul 2015 #2
Raising the floor -- I understand rogerashton Jul 2015 #7
You don't often raise the floor without lowering the ceiling. It's a matter of speed and degree. merrily Jul 2015 #8
We agree. rogerashton Jul 2015 #17
Patrimonial means wealth inherited from a father or other male family member. merrily Jul 2015 #18
More than three words! rogerashton Jul 2015 #21
Come on now. merrily Jul 2015 #22
This sort of "gotcha" quibbling rogerashton Jul 2015 #23
Enemies? That's a surprise. Thanks for letting me know, though. merrily Jul 2015 #24
I happily claim to be a populist/progressive daybranch Jul 2015 #13
Agree: People of all ages and of all kinds can and should unite for their shared vision. merrily Jul 2015 #15
I want to thank the alerter for bringing your OP to my attention, so I could req it. magical thyme Jul 2015 #3
Yet, the OP itself said that the DSAUSA is not a political party. In italics even. merrily Jul 2015 #4
and juror #2 took the time to research and confirm that the OP was correct magical thyme Jul 2015 #5
In my mind, the burden of proof is on the alerter. merrily Jul 2015 #6
on the bright side, the alerter introduced 7 people to the DSAUSA magical thyme Jul 2015 #9
So, in addition to thanking the 7 jurors, I should have thanked the alerter? merrily Jul 2015 #10
you don't have to do anything of the sort, nor did I suggest it. magical thyme Jul 2015 #11
You did indeed. No need for excessive repetition. merrily Jul 2015 #12
Bookmarked for later - thanks! LiberalElite Jul 2015 #14
My pleasure! merrily Jul 2015 #20
Calling out DINOs daybranch Jul 2015 #16
Like you, the DSAUSA believes in working within the existing Democratic Party structure. merrily Jul 2015 #19
Interesting, don't much about them either, but if they work within sabrina 1 Jul 2015 #25
Very true. Kath1 Jul 2015 #26
That seems to be their objective. merrily Jul 2015 #27
Lol, 'all my base' belong to him too. But the idea of the Left infiltrating its own supposed sabrina 1 Jul 2015 #28
We were not pushed out, only pushed resolutely to the side. Third Wayers sure wanted our votes. merrily Aug 2015 #29
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Populist Reform of the Democratic Party»Populists: support the De...»Reply #8