Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Populist Reform of the Democratic Party
In reply to the discussion: Huddle Up: WEDGE ISSUES [View all]d_legendary1
(2,586 posts)23. Could not agree anymore on this topic!
Remember all those religious bills, hunting bills, and a bunch of right wing bull cocky that brought their people to the polls? It still happens! As much as people are hurting for jobs placing something miniscule like a freedom of religion bill (coming to a ballot near you) will attract the religionist to vote against their own interest. My wife was once a victim of wedge issues and now she asks me what these laws (or candidates) actually mean (I make it a point to read the proposed legislation or bio).
Its a big time pain to have to tell people that even though candidate A is going to protect the clergy from marrying gays (wedge issue) he also wants to send your job to an HB-1 visa holder.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
wedge issues have done a spectacular job, of splitting the 99 percent against each other
HFRN
Jul 2015
#3
I have no interest in "winning DU," nor do I think it's possible. Alternatively, DU was won months
merrily
Jul 2015
#10
But, my post said: I have no interest in "winning DU," nor do I think it's possible.
merrily
Jul 2015
#28
Calling other people's basic rights 'a wedge issue' is inherently problematic.
Bluenorthwest
Jul 2015
#12
I may not be the best person to speak, but if your kid's life is danger or your own, you might
merrily
Jul 2015
#34
The USNews article is a primer on how to use WEDGE issues to divide the GOP, not Dems.
McCamy Taylor
Jul 2015
#24
Study Karl Rove's Machiavellian tactics. Then match them to the 'talking points'
sabrina 1
Jul 2015
#41
Yes, but candidates still hope to disqualify each other. And, sometimes they succeed.
merrily
Jul 2015
#45
The fissures do not need identification. They've been known here since forever.
merrily
Jul 2015
#42