Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
3. Thank you. You provided a lot of facts that I did not know or had forgotten.
Sun Apr 19, 2015, 03:56 AM
Apr 2015

Especially about Hillary Clinton's 2008 campaign.

I'm supporting Bernie Sanders at this point. Thus far, I think he has the cleanest record in terms of the sources of his campaign funds and is the most credible on the issue of campaign finance and (too many ands, I know) the more likely than Elizabeth Warren to run.

But then, anything could happen to Hillary Clinton because she has taken the easy way out in the past in order to accumulate enough money to fund her campaign.

I think that Hillary Clinton needs more money than someone like Bernie Sanders does to run. That is because Hillary Clinton needs a lot of political and media and image advisers in order to maintain the slick kind of campaign she needs to compete with a charlatan like Ted Cruz or a person with personal assets and very rich backers like Jeb Bush.

I don't think Bernie Sanders needs that stuff. He is a crusty old, very smart, very down-to-earth guy. People naturally like him because he is so himself.

I think the only candidate who has said he is seriously thinking about running, the only one who could maybe turn around our campaign finance trap and defeat the money of the 1% is Bernie. And he may not have to win the presidency to do it although I think he would make a great president and of the likely contenders, the best president of the lot.

I hope Bernie runs as a Democrat. It would cause complete chaos in the money-run Democratic Party that we now know, and I think that would be a good thing.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

K&R! Sherman A1 Apr 2015 #1
Kicked and recommended a whole bunch! Enthusiast Apr 2015 #2
Hillary has voiced her opinion. merrily Apr 2015 #7
Thank you. You provided a lot of facts that I did not know or had forgotten. JDPriestly Apr 2015 #3
AFAIK, whatever money Bernie has, he earned outside Congress or saved from his salary-- merrily Apr 2015 #9
I agree. JDPriestly Apr 2015 #12
Excellent post. LuvNewcastle Apr 2015 #4
Thank you! merrily Apr 2015 #13
Great post. And this is exactly why we need to strongly support Wolf PAC's efforts! RiverLover Apr 2015 #5
Then please donate to the DU for WolfPAC fund demwing Oct 2015 #22
Kick for exposure / nt demwing Apr 2015 #6
What if it became Dem Party policy to refuse to take huge amounts of Corporate money? sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #8
Thank you, sabrina 1. Yes, of course, any politician can turn down money, if he or she wants to. merrily Apr 2015 #14
It would be a very popular thing to do right now. But as you say, they would have to WANT to do it. sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #16
Obama promised to abide by McCain Feingold in 2008, provided the merrily Apr 2015 #17
K&R Cosmic Kitten Apr 2015 #10
To me it is unimportant what she says NOW. sadoldgirl Apr 2015 #11
IMO, no Dem primary to speak of is a huge mistake, and that is one of the reasons I oppose the merrily Apr 2015 #15
Good OP to read again, now that Bill Clinton has once again called for a sabrina 1 Oct 2015 #18
Great post! marym625 Oct 2015 #19
Thank you, mary. I used to at least try to make them good. merrily Oct 2015 #20
OMG, Hillary just said it again. merrily Oct 2015 #21
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Populist Reform of the Democratic Party»"We must get money o...»Reply #3