How ‘Looking Forward’ Tripped Up Obama-- by Robert Parry [View all]
(This is a fascinating read--I found much to think about from this article.. Still thinking about it after I read it.)
----------
Published on Thursday, March 13, 2014 by Consortium News
How Looking Forward Tripped Up Obama
by Robert Parry
When historians set off to write the story of Barack Obamas administration, they will have to struggle with why the 44th President chose not to hold his predecessor accountable for grave crimes of state and why he failed to take control of his own foreign policy.
This failure, which began with Obamas early decision to look forward, not backward and to retain much of George W. Bushs national security bureaucracy, has now led Obama into a scandal over the CIAs resistance to the Senate Intelligence Committee drafting of a long-delayed report on the Bush-era policy of torturing war on terror detainees.
----------snip--------
Barack Obamas election in 2008 was, in part, driven by public revulsion over the bloody conflict in Iraq and revelations about the torture of detainees and other crimes that surrounded Bushs post-9/11 war on terror. Yet, after winning the White House, Obama shied away from a clean break from Bushs policies.
Obama was persuaded to staff much of his national security team with a team of rivals, which meant retaining Bushs Defense Secretary Robert Gates (something no previous president had ever done), appointing hawkish Sen. Hillary Clinton to be Secretary of State, and ordering no shake-up of Bushs military high command, including media-favorite Gen. David Petraeus.
Longtime CIA apparatchik Brennan, who was implicated in some of Bushs most controversial actions, was named Obamas White House counterterrorism adviser. As former CIA analyst Ray McGovern wrote, Brennan was a senior CIA official during President George W. Bushs dark side days of waterboarding detainees, renditioning suspects to Mideast torture centers and making up intelligence to invade Iraq.
Part of the reason for Obamas timidity may have been his lack of experience and his fear that any missteps would be seized on by his opponents to question his fitness for the job. By surrounding himself with Bushs advisers and Democratic adversaries, he may have thought that he was keeping them safely inside his tent.
The Democratic Party also has a very thin bench of national security experts. Official Washington has been so dominated by foreign policy tough-guy-ism for decades at least since Ronald Reagan crushed Jimmy Carter in 1980 that most Democrats who could survive a congressional confirmation hearing have had to bow to this prevailing sentiment.
Theres also the U.S. news media, which readily joins any war-fevered stampede. Obama may have calculated that his presidency would have been trampled by endless recriminations if he had fully repudiated Bushs legacy.
GETTING SUCKED IN
Continued at: http://www.commondreams.org/view/2014/03/13