Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Progressive Media Resources Group

BelgianMadCow

(5,379 posts)

1. That would be a case of NSA trying to bend the regulatory process, right?

Reply to KoKo (Original post)

Mon Nov 4, 2013, 03:10 AM

Nov 2013

Par for the course, given that we also learned they infiltrate regulatory commissions etc that deal with cryptography, to "massage" the results if not outright sabotage them.

Thanks for posting!

on edit:

Companies outside the US were not allowed to compete for the Iana contract, and having this central component controlled by the US government – with changes to top level domains passing through the US department of commerce – has long been been a point of contention.

This needs to change.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

2 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

GUARDIAN: "NSA Furor Has Roots in US Internet Imperialism" [View all] KoKo Nov 2013 OP

That would be a case of NSA trying to bend the regulatory process, right? BelgianMadCow Nov 2013 #1

k&r thanks for posting. rhett o rick Nov 2013 #2