Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ucrdem

(15,720 posts)
2. Now this is intriguing.
Sat Mar 16, 2013, 03:38 PM
Mar 2013

Some notable Catholic clerics and thinkers have been discovered, or at least convincingly argued, to have been conversos whose families converted from Judaism under compulsion real or virtual in the 12th-15th centuries. Barotolomé de Las Casas, the 16th century Salamancan priest and "protector of the Indios," comes to mind. I came across a fairly recent (07?) NYU dissertation arguing that Las Casas, like Columbus, was likely a son of conversos whose family histories gave both of them a sense of messianic purpose, in Las Casas' case working itself out by the convert becoming the converter.

And a great converter he was. Why Las Casas hasn't been made a saint I don't know but I imagine it has something to do with the unsavory truths he published about the Spanish encounter with los indígenas americanos, which for centuries after his death in 1566 were considered wild fabrications and defamations, and still are in Spain, notwithstanding that demographers in recent decades have concluded that he was telling the appalling truth.

Anyway I see this as a sign that Francis, whether or not there were conversos in his family, comes to Rome ready to hit the ground running and won't have to spend years reinventing that particular wheel.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Interfaith Group»Pope Francis I Speaks on ...»Reply #2