Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control Reform Activism
In reply to the discussion: We tax a gallon of gasoline to build and maintain roads and bridges [View all]Straw Man
(6,763 posts)27. Rights.
Provided we have a constitutional right to firearms (and, quite honestly, that 'right' hinges on which ever direction the Supreme Court leans), there is no such provision for ammunition.
Well, that would have been a pretty sorry-ass militia, then, with their ammunition-less arms. No, I think you'd have a hard sell to the Supreme Court with that one.
And for the strict constructionists among us, I'm quite comfortable with everyone having the right to own a single shot musket.
If you would like a response to that statement, I must insist that you write it on parchment with a quill pen and have it delivered to my home by a horseback messenger. I can PM you the address. If you would like to include the entire forum in the conversation, please hand-set it using lead type and print up as many copies as are necessary using a manual press. And hire a lot more horses.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
55 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
not sure it will go away, and in the meantime, guns are a very big part of violence and pollution
CreekDog
Mar 2013
#24
Agree. But most who covet guns would still covet them, carry them, buy the latest lethal technology
Hoyt
Mar 2013
#30
Because it partly works, and the US is going to need all kinds of solutions to fix the problem.
PDJane
Mar 2013
#3
How about we tax food at 10%. That way everyone pays more. Granted the poor will feel the pinch
geckosfeet
Mar 2013
#12
The plan is to make those who can afford it pay, not to tax the essentials of life.
PDJane
Mar 2013
#18
I have long proposed a $5 per round tax on handgun calibers .25 & up, and on the military-style
apocalypsehow
Mar 2013
#10
No, it wouldn't. Congress could raise it to a MILLION dollars a round, and the courts
apocalypsehow
Mar 2013
#41
Not so-the Supremes have already held that such a tax is unconstitutional
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2013
#50
it's a partial and temporary solution. The permanent solution is going to be a long slog.
PDJane
Mar 2013
#25
one or two. Mostly around one thing that had to be built, like water purification.
PDJane
Mar 2013
#38
Yep, I meant 7.62 X 39, the so-called "Soviet round." Thanks for the correction. n/t.
apocalypsehow
Mar 2013
#42
Would need a direct connection. Tax going to pay hospitals for handling gunshot wounds, or form an
freshwest
Mar 2013
#46
The owner of the gun, just like the owner of a car. Inanimate objects can't sign contracts. Not yet.
freshwest
Mar 2013
#48
The reason I asked was because some folks were talking about a policy for each firearm.
oneshooter
Mar 2013
#49