DU Community Help

Hermit-The-Prog

(36,631 posts)

7. I know one member can't sequentially alert on one post

Sat Dec 2, 2023, 04:17 PM

Dec 2023

An alert for some offense may be sent by one member and after a jury declares it does not violate the rule, an alert for the same or different offense may be sent by another member. I've seen this happen while serving on MIRT.

As far as an edited post between alert and a jury, I see nothing wrong with that. When I'm on a jury, I deal only with what I'm presented -- the claim, the rule, the rationale, the possibly offending post, and whatever contextual posts are presented. If I feel the post, as presented, does not violate the rule, that's how I'll vote. If it is later edited to break the rule, I would hope some watchful member will alert on it.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Two jury coding issues. [View all] Ms. Toad Oct 2023 OP

The top one is new to me EarlG Oct 2023 #1

I missed this when you responded Ms. Toad Dec 2023 #2

I treat jury duty as if it's a real jury -- if it's not presented in 'court', it's not evidence. Hermit-The-Prog Dec 2023 #3

Real juries have real people who curate the evidence. Ms. Toad Dec 2023 #4

There can be as many alerts on a post as there are members reading it. Hermit-The-Prog Dec 2023 #5

There can be lots of alerts, but each post is only adjudicated once. Ms. Toad Dec 2023 #6

I know one member can't sequentially alert on one post Hermit-The-Prog Dec 2023 #7

An alert after modification does not result on a second adjudication. Ms. Toad Dec 2023 #8

I follow the instructions given. I don't recall ever being called to judge edit history. Hermit-The-Prog Dec 2023 #9