Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DU Community Help

reACTIONary

(6,292 posts)

4. Thanks....

Reply to hlthe2b (Reply #3)

Mon Jul 5, 2021, 08:41 PM

Jul 2021

... for the suggestion. I understand the need for venting, and I'm generally willing to let it go. (I'm a liberal, after all.) However, some of the posts I've seen lately are just a bit too genuine and authentic to ignore.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

A question about the tos, in relation to [View all] reACTIONary Jul 2021 OP

here ya go CurtEastPoint Jul 2021 #1

Thanks for the suggestion! nt reACTIONary Jul 2021 #6

I believe "No kooky, extremist, or hate content" fits Yonnie3 Jul 2021 #2

Thanks for the suggestion! nt reACTIONary Jul 2021 #5

Most seem to use the "No kooky, extremist, or hate content" rule, I think hlthe2b Jul 2021 #3

Thanks.... reACTIONary Jul 2021 #4

Back on DU.2, "advocating violence towards a public figure" was a specific rule Rhiannon12866 Jul 2021 #7

Thanks! I thought I had seen... reACTIONary Jul 2021 #8