Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
History of Feminism
In reply to the discussion: In honor of Seabeyond, Trumad, and Intaglio [View all]cinnabonbon
(860 posts)68. I miss them too.
How long do they have to stay away?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
122 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I see something in A LOT of them that I am pretty sure they are not realizing they communicate:
Squinch
Jan 2014
#84
He got FOUR yesterday? He must have said something perceptive to piss them off so much.
Squinch
Jan 2014
#26
Alerter almost lost their alerting privileges for 24 hours. Some excellent jury comments, thanks
Tuesday Afternoon
Jan 2014
#90
It amazes me what people alert on around here. When I see a post like that has been alerted on
Tuesday Afternoon
Jan 2014
#114
Someone posted a list of MRA debate tactics, which give excellent examples of this.
redqueen
Jan 2014
#17
Well if you do, be forewarned, the feminism and related tags are trolled HARD.
redqueen
Jan 2014
#102
Yes, but it's so hard to ignore that sexist bullshit, especially when you see it here.
SunSeeker
Jan 2014
#40
I have most on ignore (so I can't see the conversations where intaglio got ignored.)
Squinch
Jan 2014
#41
Thank you. As I said to BainsBane, I wasn't thinking. I forgot the transparency page!
Squinch
Jan 2014
#39
But any "obvious animosity" can be addressed by using the jury blacklist (nt)
Nye Bevan
Jan 2014
#97
I don't see it as being fixable. It is seen as unfair and when people feel they have been
seaglass
Jan 2014
#106
I agree, being concerned with fairness may not be the ruling concern for some people. n/t
UtahLib
Jan 2014
#107
No one in this subthread said anything about a conspiracy. Perhaps you are directing your
seaglass
Jan 2014
#119
I imagine that pointing out obvious realities may often be seen as anger...
LanternWaste
Jan 2014
#73
Something deliberately offensive or mean-spirited which toes the line just enough to not be noticed
nomorenomore08
Jan 2014
#87
No argument from me. And it's sad, when most of us probably agree on 90% of the basics. n/t
nomorenomore08
Jan 2014
#89