History of Feminism

Recursion

(56,582 posts)

43. And, not to put too fine a point on it, I present substantively the same arguments

Wed Dec 11, 2013, 09:43 AM

Dec 2013

and have 0 hides. Not because I make those arguments better, but because I have "M" in my profile, and I'm not being alert-stalked by MRAs (yet).

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

84 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Victim Shaming on behalf of Julian Assange [View all] BainsBane Dec 2013 OP

Fuck Julian Assange ismnotwasm Dec 2013 #1

About your post title - Please don't intaglio Dec 2013 #2

from what i understand, that is his goal. to get women preg.... egomaniac. nt seabeyond Dec 2013 #4

You mean the "no you fuck him" types ismnotwasm Dec 2013 #17

egomaniac and weasel are the two descriptive i put on the guy also. wowser, lol. nt seabeyond Dec 2013 #19

Was Julian Assange Of WikiLeaks Set Up? WillYourVoteBCounted Dec 2013 #23

right. the all important cable that putin is an alpha. wowsers... nt seabeyond Dec 2013 #24

This started out consensual with both women ismnotwasm Dec 2013 #30

What's not a coincidence is people standing behind an accused rapist BainsBane Dec 2013 #31

For a start off these are not the first allegations intaglio Dec 2013 #33

We are Women Against Rape but we do not want Julian Assange extradited... Rockyj Dec 2013 #58

this is why using "women against rape" with this article is garbage. everyone knows the sweden seabeyond Dec 2013 #65

What is the worst thing that can be done to destroy a persons credibility Rockyj Dec 2013 #51

ah. so when a woman says no (because no condom) and a man holds her down, that is acceptable seabeyond Dec 2013 #52

That story has changed many times... Rockyj Dec 2013 #53

Supposed Rajputs = good. Supposed victim = bad. No day in court cause the net says so. seabeyond Dec 2013 #54

Hey, you know, it's all the rage xulamaude Dec 2013 #56

So you were there? Rockyj Dec 2013 #57

Not "there" xulamaude Dec 2013 #60

you seem to throw up the no one knows when convenient, yet deny the women the right to take to court seabeyond Dec 2013 #66

Wow. You have a lot of nerve to come into this space and diss one of our most Sheldon Cooper Dec 2013 #55

Whoa there... Rockyj Dec 2013 #59

Maybe you should read up on some things before you come in here running your mouth. Sheldon Cooper Dec 2013 #62

Thank you. nt xulamaude Dec 2013 #63

"I question your sudden concern for the so called victims". that would be a personal attack. and seabeyond Dec 2013 #67

he is pure egomaniac. i did nto think much of him and manning prior to rape charges. but, since... seabeyond Dec 2013 #3

Why can't mercuryblues Dec 2013 #5

both, what? i believe it is a big old scam. he isnt wanted. he is not gonna be got by u.s. seabeyond Dec 2013 #6

Wikileaks hits that turned the world on its head WillYourVoteBCounted Dec 2013 #22

i knew most of that shit before wiki came out. and if i knew most of the stuff, bet it pretty much seabeyond Dec 2013 #25

Vast Lying Machine xulamaude Dec 2013 #26

He could have both gollygee Dec 2013 #7

Your last sentence poses a good question. Sheldon Cooper Dec 2013 #8

that is mercuryblues Dec 2013 #9

and that should be easy. it doesnt conflict. that would be the difference of judging and not. seabeyond Dec 2013 #11

gasp... obama. lol. nt seabeyond Dec 2013 #12

and also some insist if you want to see Assange answer for the sexual assault BainsBane Dec 2013 #16

It's a damn mysogynist view. So what IF xulamaude Dec 2013 #20

exactly. point on. nt seabeyond Dec 2013 #21

I don't understand BainsBane Dec 2013 #14

exactly mercuryblues Dec 2013 #15

For certain people, Assange is the star quarterback of their favorite football team nt geek tragedy Dec 2013 #10

perfectly said. i posted elsewhere. it reminds me of the 67k people that cheered a possible rapist seabeyond Dec 2013 #13

I agree DonCoquixote Dec 2013 #18

It is exactly the same BainsBane Dec 2013 #29

imo, it is a case of he said, she said eilen Dec 2013 #27

Post removed Post removed Dec 2013 #28

This message was self-deleted by its author BainsBane Dec 2013 #32

I wrote an OP in GD BainsBane Dec 2013 #34

Why on earth was your post hidden? Sheldon Cooper Dec 2013 #35

i re read that post. du has pretty much set itself up with jury so women canNOT even argue sexism, seabeyond Dec 2013 #36

Mommy, make those mean feminists go away!!! Sheldon Cooper Dec 2013 #37

and with this rigged system... they can. thanks adm... nt seabeyond Dec 2013 #38

Yep. Sheldon Cooper Dec 2013 #39

FWIW, jury results.... SidDithers Dec 2013 #47

and look how close. one more. i am shut up. how many posts do i get alerted on a day.... seabeyond Dec 2013 #48

Thanks Sid.. wow. I saw BainsBane's question in AKA.. Cha Dec 2013 #84

Yup. I wish that weren't true, but it's absolutely true. Recursion Dec 2013 #41

i have 6 hides. because someone presents the offensive. i challenge the offensive. how does one seabeyond Dec 2013 #42

And, not to put too fine a point on it, I present substantively the same arguments Recursion Dec 2013 #43

absolutely. nt seabeyond Dec 2013 #44

women are dropping like flies. this has become an hostile environment for the women that speak out. seabeyond Dec 2013 #45

Thank you, thank you, thank you! nt xulamaude Dec 2013 #49

Right, it must've been sexism for a jury to hide "fuck you, darlin' nt" and "fuck you. and i will Electric Monk Dec 2013 #61

"Jurors, please note context." xulamaude Dec 2013 #64

i was pointing out the poster said screw off. screw off = fuck you. so no, that was not seabeyond Dec 2013 #68

That's a stinking lie. polly7 Dec 2013 #70

scew off = fuck you. no polly. it is not a lie. now.... go away. nt seabeyond Dec 2013 #71

It absolutely was a lie. polly7 Dec 2013 #72

the lie is saying. screw off = fuck you, is saying fuck you, to you. as the alerter did. seabeyond Dec 2013 #73

I never told 'you' to screw off. polly7 Dec 2013 #74

who reads what you write. look at this post. it is so full of trash talk why would i bother. seabeyond Dec 2013 #75

I don't give aflying fuck how you read it. polly7 Dec 2013 #76

see. again, polly.... first sentence in title. you start. no readie..... nt seabeyond Dec 2013 #79

It is indeed quite toxic. Sheldon Cooper Dec 2013 #78

Agreed. xulamaude Dec 2013 #80

did i show you my latest FB sheldon cooper. i love the dude. seabeyond Dec 2013 #81

I love Sheldon. Sheldon Cooper Dec 2013 #82

lol. and mama. nt seabeyond Dec 2013 #83

"Either you're that stupid, or you purposefully misunderstood to make yourself the poor victim..." xulamaude Dec 2013 #77

I have no clue ismnotwasm Dec 2013 #46

shameful hide. grantcart Dec 2013 #50

Why the fuck was that post hidden? Recursion Dec 2013 #40

I have no idea, but that was as bad a hide as I have ever seen. mtnester Dec 2013 #69