Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PoindexterOglethorpe

(27,129 posts)
2. That's fascinating.
Fri Jul 24, 2020, 06:09 PM
Jul 2020

The article sort of makes it sound as if smallpox is a relatively recent disease. It's not.

There are Egyptian mummies that clearly show smallpox scars. And there was an epidemic of the disease around 1350 BCE. I realize that article is talking about the genetics, and it's quite fascinating, especially how much the virus seems to have evolved over time, even though it's still smallpox.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Anthropology»Smallpox-Infected Viking ...»Reply #2