Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Anthropology

PoindexterOglethorpe

(27,021 posts)

5. What an incredible assumption, that it was made by

Reply to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Thu Aug 3, 2017, 01:07 PM

Aug 2017

a male for his "favourite woman".

Maybe it was made by a woman for herself. Or for her best friend.

All we know is that it's a bracelet that someone made.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Is this stunning bracelet made by Paleolithic man for his favourite woman really 70,000 years old? [View all] Judi Lynn Aug 2017 OP

Talent is age independent Lithos Aug 2017 #1

Why not? However, it could have been made by a woman for her husband or Warpy Aug 2017 #2

"Hand axe... 250,000 years ago... before modern homo sap sap" Citation Needed DRoseDARs Aug 2017 #3

BBC documentary, "Wisdom of the Stones" Warpy Aug 2017 #6

Fascinating, trying to see if I can hunt down more info. Thank you. nt DRoseDARs Aug 2017 #7

Hope so. I found the image on Pinterest Warpy Aug 2017 #8

This predates Homo sapiens leaving the east central rift valley in Africa by 20,000 years. Botany Aug 2017 #4

What an incredible assumption, that it was made by PoindexterOglethorpe Aug 2017 #5