Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Anthropology

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)

3. Doesn't the haplogroup's presence in Iceland suggests people moved along both the ice-front

Reply to Ichingcarpenter (Original post)

Sat Apr 30, 2016, 09:53 AM

Apr 2016

and the sea-shores, either with the aid of watercraft, on foot/sledge or perhaps both?

There has been speculation about pre-clovis colonization of eastern NA from nw europe.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The odd world distribution of ancient Haplogroup X Mitochondrial DNA [View all] Ichingcarpenter Apr 2016 OP

Vikings Sunlei Apr 2016 #1

Nope, the vikings didnt become a major power until about 1300 years ago where as this is said cstanleytech Apr 2016 #2

Doesn't the haplogroup's presence in Iceland suggests people moved along both the ice-front HereSince1628 Apr 2016 #3

The earliest settlers came to Ireland around 10,000 years ago, Ichingcarpenter May 2016 #4

Haplogroup X Mitochondrial DNA jedague Sep 2019 #5

Welcome to the DU. nt fleabiscuit Sep 2019 #6