Binary Energy Dynamics - exploring the relationship between energy sequences and prime factorization

[mikelewis]

16. Important Note : When numbers are in registers in a computer, they are energy.

Last edited Thu Dec 26, 2024, 12:28 PM - Edit history (3)

Why I believe this idea is germane is simply because when you put numbers into binary and load them into registers, they are an energy sequence. You can measure that energy and even manipulate it if you understand how.

This post is the first step in learning how to do that...

This isn't just a new way to factor a composite or prove a number is prime. There is a lot more under the hood that I have intentionally left out. The Python program will help you analyze the number and see the relationships.

If you have no use for this, I completely understand. I am using it to build a new operating system so it's necessary for my purposes. In fact, the composites I'll be dissolving are well over 1000 digits so things like RSA security become much less secure with this python program. I'm not even certain quantumly derived keys using Shor are out of my reach as my goal is the instant dissolution of billions of digits into their prime factors. And when I say, Instantly, I mean instantly... like wave collapse.

This post provides the basics. You now have a new understanding of Null, 0 and the energy in each number and where you derived that energy. If other people have had similar ideas in the past, wonderful... it means I might be right. How awesome. I also explained where I got this math... Noether, Newton and Leibniz so be certain to tell them what hacks they are when they hang your pictures next to theirs on the wall of great minds... LOL Morons...

Read this or don't, if you truly don't understand something, I will answer but as of now... As no one has refuted the math or logic and all I have to work with are hateful hecklers, I think I'm done with this post and chapter as well. I don't appreciate mean-spirited hecklers who have no point whatsoever, I'm done with nonsense like that so if you have a sincere question, talk to me respectfully or kindly fuck the fuck off... you just make me think you're dumber than I already did. Now that was supposed to be impossible... LOL

Let’s talk about RSA. You know, that bedrock of internet security? The one we all trust to keep our passwords, bank accounts, and private messages safe? Here’s the thing: it’s good—brilliant, actually. But it’s not perfect. RSA relies on the difficulty of factoring large numbers into primes, a task that’s computationally brutal for classical systems. But it has one glaring Achilles' heel: it’s a static system in a world that’s increasingly dynamic.

RSA, for all its brilliance, is like a live wire. It works because the key pairs (the public and private keys) stay put. You can encrypt something with the public key, and only the private key can unlock it. But the moment someone gets hold of that private key—or builds a quantum computer that can factor those massive numbers efficiently—it’s game over. And the data you thought was locked up forever? It’s suddenly an open book.

Here’s where it gets wild. Binary Energy Dynamics, this research I’ve been working on, could be both the illness and the cure for RSA. Let me explain.

---

The Illness: Dynamic Numbers and RSA’s Static Weakness

RSA was built in an era when numbers were treated as static objects. A prime number was just a prime number. A composite number was just a product of primes. But Binary Energy Dynamics flips this understanding on its head. Numbers aren’t static—they’re systems. They have energy. They oscillate, they shift, they move. And when you start to see numbers this way, something becomes very clear: static systems like RSA can’t hold up in a dynamic world.

Let’s say you’re using RSA encryption, and you send a message. That message is protected by the sheer computational difficulty of factoring your key’s massive number. But what happens when someone—let’s call them a “dynamic thinker”—starts treating your key not as a static number but as an energy system? Suddenly, they’re not just brute-forcing factors. They’re looking at the patterns, the shifts, the chiralities of the number itself. It’s like staring at the waves on a beach and predicting the tide instead of measuring every grain of sand. With Binary Energy Dynamics, factoring isn’t just a math problem anymore—it’s a physics problem. And physics has tools to see patterns that math alone can’t.

---

The Cure: Dynamism as Security

Here’s where things get interesting. The same principles that make RSA vulnerable could also make it unbreakable. If we stop thinking of keys as static objects and start treating them as dynamic, evolving systems, we can build a new kind of encryption—one that isn’t just hard to break but impossible to predict.

Imagine an encryption system where the key isn’t a fixed number but a constantly shifting structure. The user holds one part of the system—a password, for example—and the server holds the other part: randomness and a few secrets. When the user logs in, the two systems interact, creating a unique, dynamic key that exists for just a moment before careening off into irrelevance. Even if someone were watching, they’d only see the echoes of a system already gone.

And here’s the kicker: Binary Energy Dynamics doesn’t just break RSA’s static flaws; it can repair those flaws and then build on the previous success. RSA’s reliance on prime factorization isn’t a weakness if the factors themselves are in constant flux. Instead of guarding a static key, you guard a dynamic process. The live wire becomes a lightning bolt—unpredictable, untouchable, and secure.

---

The Paradox of Progress

This is where I need to tread carefully. The ideas behind Binary Energy Dynamics are powerful, and like all powerful tools, they can cut both ways. On one hand, they could instantly dismantle the very foundations of RSA and other encryption systems. On the other hand, they could rebuild those foundations into something far stronger.

The illness and the cure are one and the same. If we keep treating numbers as static objects, we’ll lose the encryption arms race. Quantum computers will see to that. But if we embrace the dynamism of numbers—their energy, their shifts, their inherent motion—we could build systems that are not just secure but future-proof.

---

A Warning and a Hope

This isn’t just a math problem. It’s a philosophical one. Security has always been about balance—between simplicity and complexity, openness and secrecy, static and dynamic. Binary Energy Dynamics tilts that balance, forcing us to rethink what security means in a world where numbers are alive.

I’m not going to hand you the blueprint here. That’s not the point. The point is to see the cracks in the old system and the potential in the new one. RSA isn’t dead—not yet. But it’s living on borrowed time. The question isn’t whether it will fail but whether we’ll be ready with something better when it does.

Binary Energy Dynamics might be the illness, but it’s also the cure. And in a world where the stakes are this high, we can’t afford to ignore either.