Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Many stories have been told and written. MineralMan Apr 2019 #1
Faith is a special device for justifying biased decisions. Bretton Garcia Apr 2019 #2
Faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen. MineralMan Apr 2019 #3
Faith does not "walk by ... sight" or visible evidence. Bretton Garcia Apr 2019 #12
How does a group of blind people describe an elephant? MineralMan Apr 2019 #15
While I get the point it's trying to make Lordquinton Apr 2019 #19
P. T. Barnum had something to say about that. nt tblue37 Apr 2019 #78
He also had a thing or two to say about Elephants as well Lordquinton Apr 2019 #80
in general, we are not rational creatures. So no reasoned argument penetrates faith. marylandblue Apr 2019 #4
Accept all the crimes of religion? Bretton Garcia Apr 2019 #13
Who said anything about accepting crimes? marylandblue Apr 2019 #14
Yes it does. Bretton Garcia Apr 2019 #16
Now there's a rational answer. marylandblue Apr 2019 #17
Yes it is. Bretton Garcia Apr 2019 #20
YEEESSSS!!!! uriel1972 Apr 2019 #21
People are really confused about what acceptance means and what it does. marylandblue Apr 2019 #29
Radical acceptance is not fatalism, but accepting what's in front of you. marylandblue Apr 2019 #23
As an historian and educator, I disagree. Bretton Garcia Apr 2019 #26
Do all historians and educators agree with you? marylandblue Apr 2019 #28
Most can distinguish between a logical versus a very emotional argument. Bretton Garcia Apr 2019 #30
Do the sociologists assume people always act rationally marylandblue Apr 2019 #32
We can predict situations where people will react emotionally Bretton Garcia Apr 2019 #34
How are defining "reacting emotionally" and "reacting emotionally" marylandblue Apr 2019 #43
We know about 1) animal instincts. say. Bretton Garcia Apr 2019 #47
None of that comes close to answering my question. marylandblue Apr 2019 #48
Correct grammar in your question? Bretton Garcia Apr 2019 #50
Oh I see. Sorry about that. Here marylandblue Apr 2019 #51
I'm using say, the five sources cited above with others Bretton Garcia Apr 2019 #53
We are creatures who can reason, and we can learn to do it better. marylandblue Apr 2019 #55
Need for money, jobs, food, is both emotional and rational Bretton Garcia Apr 2019 #56
A lot of the needs we call rational are based in our organic nature or social matrix. marylandblue Apr 2019 #61
Hunger is instinctual. But on analysis, we see it is rational too. Bretton Garcia Apr 2019 #64
You are confusing the experience that actually causes us to eat marylandblue Apr 2019 #67
Jefferson made a mistake. Bretton Garcia Apr 2019 #68
We seem to be having a disconnect and I don't know why marylandblue Apr 2019 #72
To accept what can't be changed... uriel1972 Apr 2019 #31
That's not how I was taught about acceptance. I was taught marylandblue Apr 2019 #33
The Serenity Prayer is religious in origin Bretton Garcia Apr 2019 #35
Shoot the messenger's mother? marylandblue Apr 2019 #42
Apparently it means substituting cigarettes donuts and bad coffee for alcohol, Voltaire2 Apr 2019 #44
You just don't like the religious origin and formulation, so I'll give you a non-religious one. marylandblue Apr 2019 #46
Just pointing out that the serene passivity of 12 step programs is an evidential failure Voltaire2 Apr 2019 #49
AA popularized the Serenity Prayer, but they didn't write it marylandblue Apr 2019 #52
So if there will always be evil in the world, why resist it? Bretton Garcia Apr 2019 #57
We are always solving the problems that are in front of us. marylandblue Apr 2019 #60
It's probably just semantics whether you call suffering evil. Bretton Garcia Apr 2019 #65
I don't know why the "courage to change the things I can" is being missed marylandblue Apr 2019 #66
The rub is, many think many things can't be fixed, that are fixable. Bretton Garcia Apr 2019 #69
I don't interpret prayers that way and I don't know anybody who does. marylandblue Apr 2019 #71
Google "Locus of Control" safeinOhio Apr 2019 #5
You do know that the concept edhopper Apr 2019 #6
I forgot that from my Systems of Psychology in college. safeinOhio Apr 2019 #7
Yeah edhopper Apr 2019 #8
How do Calvinist fit in safeinOhio Apr 2019 #9
I am not well versed in edhopper Apr 2019 #10
Only the elect can understand unconditionally. MineralMan Apr 2019 #11
If only Christians understood their own teachings! Karadeniz Apr 2019 #18
Ummmm... yeah. uriel1972 Apr 2019 #22
I'm pretty sure every Christian Mariana Apr 2019 #24
Yep. They usually just gloss over what they don't understand. Too bad. The parables are fabulous! Karadeniz Apr 2019 #75
Let's acknowledge Soph's great point Bretton Garcia Apr 2019 #25
that answer is in james 2 chapter 26 rampartc Apr 2019 #27
If only believers actually read, and believed Bretton Garcia Apr 2019 #36
One of the least-quoted verses in the New Testament. MineralMan Apr 2019 #37
this business if "faith" vs "works" goes back to martin luthor rampartc Apr 2019 #38
It goes deeper too Bretton Garcia Apr 2019 #39
you may be right rampartc Apr 2019 #40
It's the origin of the prosperity thing. But there's more Bretton Garcia Apr 2019 #41
Yes it does. Jim__ Apr 2019 #45
No.Specially if it is blind faith. democratisphere Apr 2019 #54
Conclusion: faith alone is never enough. We need reason, science, even more. Bretton Garcia Apr 2019 #58
Never. trotsky Apr 2019 #59
The Marxist have a thing called "praxis." marylandblue Apr 2019 #63
No. NeoGreen Apr 2019 #62
An answer to Guil, and the alleged inevitability of faith, belief, even for rationalists Bretton Garcia Apr 2019 #70
Gil relies heavily on imprecise meanings of words without providing definitions marylandblue Apr 2019 #73
So we should not faithfully OR passively acquiesce to Religion Bretton Garcia Apr 2019 #74
Faith is a shield Lithos Apr 2019 #76
If you think the "shield" is true, still, Bretton Garcia Apr 2019 #81
Faith alone is always supposed to be sufficient. bitterross Apr 2019 #77
"Faith" means religions want unquestioning obedience Bretton Garcia Apr 2019 #79
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Can faith alone ever be s...»Reply #22