Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

In reply to the discussion: Is Tolerance a Good Thing? [View all]

Major Nikon

(36,877 posts)
40. There's also the fact that non-theists are persecuted for the same reasons
Thu Mar 7, 2019, 12:34 AM
Mar 2019

So one can logically disprove it both ways. Meanwhile this blatant error is excused through either ignorance of what “logic” means or gaslighting.

Is Tolerance a Good Thing? [View all] MineralMan Mar 2019 OP
Yes, I agree with that and we also need to pay attention to context marylandblue Mar 2019 #1
Yes. Comparing fundamentally dissimilar things wastes time. MineralMan Mar 2019 #2
I can't think of anything that is universally good. Act_of_Reparation Mar 2019 #3
70% Dark Chocolate? MineralMan Mar 2019 #4
Chocolate haters are irrational and the allergic need conversion therapy marylandblue Mar 2019 #5
I must disagree with you, in the most emphatic terms, about dark chocolate. MineralMan Mar 2019 #6
I must, it seems, agree with you on this matter. guillaumeb Mar 2019 #10
A number of posts in this room of 'religion' I 'tolerate'. sprinkleeninow Mar 2019 #7
Milk chocolate is an abomination and those Voltaire2 Mar 2019 #8
Heretic. Act_of_Reparation Mar 2019 #17
Is unconditional tolerance a good thing? guillaumeb Mar 2019 #9
What confusion is that? MineralMan Mar 2019 #11
The confusion evident in your original post. guillaumeb Mar 2019 #12
Which you didn't read, apparently. MineralMan Mar 2019 #13
That is, I believe, the first time you have qualified tolerance or intolerance MineralMan Mar 2019 #15
If you read the actual posts, guillaumeb Mar 2019 #16
Correction. trotsky Mar 2019 #18
The intolerance directed at theists is directed against them because they are theists. guillaumeb Mar 2019 #20
The existence of just one non-persecuted theist in China completely disproves your position. trotsky Mar 2019 #27
A failure in logic. guillaumeb Mar 2019 #32
As you are entitled to your (completely wrong) opinion. trotsky Mar 2019 #42
There's also the fact that non-theists are persecuted for the same reasons Major Nikon Mar 2019 #40
It's all about trying to tie the intolerance of the Chinese government to atheism, of course. trotsky Mar 2019 #43
Don't forget how the Boston Atheists blackballed a Trump humper Major Nikon Mar 2019 #45
So all intolerance is equally bad, but it's universal, so marylandblue Mar 2019 #19
No, but by recognizing the universality, guillaumeb Mar 2019 #21
Either it is all equal, or it is not. If it is all equal, then you have an amoral philosophy. marylandblue Mar 2019 #22
I disagree. guillaumeb Mar 2019 #23
You never actually argue for that position. marylandblue Mar 2019 #24
All human behavior has a cause. guillaumeb Mar 2019 #25
Not all behaviors are truly universal. marylandblue Mar 2019 #26
Your opinion. guillaumeb Mar 2019 #29
Are you not taking the opinion that "intolerance" is universal? marylandblue Mar 2019 #31
I am taking the position that intolerance can be found among every group of humans. guillaumeb Mar 2019 #33
Just be clear, do you think intolerance is also found in all individuals? marylandblue Mar 2019 #34
Yes to the first. guillaumeb Mar 2019 #36
You said intolerance is found in all groups. How.did you mean the term? marylandblue Mar 2019 #37
It is a confusing term. guillaumeb Mar 2019 #38
Well the two types of intolerance are not the same. marylandblue Mar 2019 #39
We agree. guillaumeb Mar 2019 #47
Yeah, but so what. It's not an endpoint, it's a marker. marylandblue Mar 2019 #48
But that begs the question. trotsky Mar 2019 #44
If your religious doctrine commands intolerance and you follow it... Major Nikon Mar 2019 #41
And if 100% of theists agreed with this interpretation, guillaumeb Mar 2019 #46
The assertion doesn't require you agree with it in order to be true Major Nikon Mar 2019 #49
Your assertion is simply that. guillaumeb Mar 2019 #55
It's a statement of fact Major Nikon Mar 2019 #56
You have a unique defintion of the word "fact". eom guillaumeb Mar 2019 #57
Your assertion is evidence of a personal opinion Major Nikon Mar 2019 #58
Once again, you reveal yourself. guillaumeb Mar 2019 #59
The whole idea behind posting is revealing something, Gil Major Nikon Mar 2019 #60
Does a church doctrine require 100% agreement to be harmful? marylandblue Mar 2019 #50
Tolerance is work. You'd have to pay me to do that and I wouldn't be happy. hunter Mar 2019 #14
When I practiced Catholicism, I never met or heard about priests molesting children... real Cannabis calm Mar 2019 #28
Welcome to DU. guillaumeb Mar 2019 #30
Pathetic. Voltaire2 Mar 2019 #53
The Southern Baptists have their own MineralMan Mar 2019 #35
Well, it's not like such priests were advertising what they were doing. MineralMan Mar 2019 #51
Seriously? Voltaire2 Mar 2019 #52
I think what makes the RCC scandal is that it was a well organized network marylandblue Mar 2019 #54
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Is Tolerance a Good Thing...»Reply #40