Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: You may be reading the Bible wrong. Pete Enns says the Bible itself shows a better way [View all]guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)60. There are limits to that freedom of conscience.
As to history, and Christians, for most of history CE, the world was ruled by monarchs. And those monarchs used religion, among other identifiers, to consolidate their own power.
As to militant atheism, or, perhaps better, power centered atheism, the rulers again use atheism, among other identifiers, to consolidate power and to divide and control.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
73 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You may be reading the Bible wrong. Pete Enns says the Bible itself shows a better way [View all]
guillaumeb
Feb 2019
OP
Theology can be very complicated, so I don't think it's a cognitive miser issue
marylandblue
Feb 2019
#43
Being "picky" just involves using our reason and intellect to evaluate moral claims.
trotsky
Feb 2019
#45
I think some kind faith is necessary for communities, not necessarily religious though.
marylandblue
Feb 2019
#59