Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

In reply to the discussion: Do we build walls, or bridges? [View all]
Do we build walls, or bridges? [View all] guillaumeb Feb 2019 OP
we are more than 2 separate nations very uneasily coexisting, in my view,. NRaleighLiberal Feb 2019 #1
And can we reconcile these multiple entities? guillaumeb Feb 2019 #2
I think it is quite a challenging thing to accomplish. NRaleighLiberal Feb 2019 #3
The rich love to divide people. guillaumeb Feb 2019 #4
I don't think it's rich dividing people marylandblue Feb 2019 #6
But it serves the interests of the rich and powerful. guillaumeb Feb 2019 #8
Sometimes it serves their interests and sometimes it doesn't marylandblue Feb 2019 #13
Coons is doing it. guillaumeb Feb 2019 #14
And the example you cited of "Coons doing it" was the "bipartisan" FOSTA bill Voltaire2 Feb 2019 #23
I already read your claims. guillaumeb Feb 2019 #25
Yes you already ran away from providing any evidence that this bill reduce exploitation and violence Voltaire2 Feb 2019 #27
Evidence in advance? guillaumeb Feb 2019 #28
NRaleigh? DU politics needs reports on Mark Meadows Bretton Garcia Feb 2019 #59
Yes he is one of the worst, for sure NRaleighLiberal Feb 2019 #61
Your concern is noted Major Nikon Feb 2019 #5
Why don't you describe some of those "areas of commonality?" MineralMan Feb 2019 #7
Do you feel that GOP voters see themselves as patriots? guillaumeb Feb 2019 #9
That is not an answer to my question. MineralMan Feb 2019 #10
I did answer it. guillaumeb Feb 2019 #11
You didn't answer at all. MineralMan Feb 2019 #12
"An interest in a functioning country." - no they want to "drown government in a bathtub". Voltaire2 Feb 2019 #20
Does every GOP voter support that idea? guillaumeb Feb 2019 #22
The Republican Party does. Voltaire2 Feb 2019 #24
The GOP is composed of actual, individual voters. guillaumeb Feb 2019 #26
It is a subset of Republican voters. Voltaire2 Feb 2019 #29
I understand that this is your belief. guillaumeb Feb 2019 #31
great so you've basically learned nothing over the last 10 years about what Voltaire2 Feb 2019 #33
The Nazis thought that a functioning country edhopper Feb 2019 #39
One view of functional. guillaumeb Feb 2019 #44
Except that the other post wasn't about that at all Lordquinton Feb 2019 #15
Except for the fact that the other post is about exactly that. guillaumeb Feb 2019 #16
It's not though Lordquinton Feb 2019 #17
General outreach is made by specific people. guillaumeb Feb 2019 #18
So you understand now that it's different situation Lordquinton Feb 2019 #34
Coons and others disagreed. guillaumeb Feb 2019 #36
What specific proposal edhopper Feb 2019 #40
I cannot answer for Coons. eom guillaumeb Feb 2019 #45
So you think reaching across to the GOP edhopper Feb 2019 #48
I did not say reach blindly, or unquestioningly. guillaumeb Feb 2019 #49
Trump's infrastructure bill edhopper Feb 2019 #50
The Democrats will have an infrastructure bill, The Repubs will have nothing marylandblue Feb 2019 #53
This is about working with the GOP edhopper Feb 2019 #54
I won't hold my breathe either, it just makes sense strategically to try marylandblue Feb 2019 #55
I said "bipartisan". eom guillaumeb Feb 2019 #63
Have you seen any willingness edhopper Feb 2019 #65
Most people who use their religion to oppress others feel they are doing the right thing Lordquinton Feb 2019 #41
People generally feel that they are doing the right thing. guillaumeb Feb 2019 #46
Your attempt to reframe is noted. Lordquinton Feb 2019 #51
Your attempt to deny the obvious is noted. eom guillaumeb Feb 2019 #64
What am I denying? Lordquinton Feb 2019 #67
But if we see the same human behaviors no matter the sub-group, guillaumeb Feb 2019 #70
You are using it as a straw man to avoid talking about it in the religious context Lordquinton Feb 2019 #96
So, to bring it back around to the topic you are avoiding Lordquinton Feb 2019 #103
The difference is one of those can rely on delusion for justification Major Nikon Feb 2019 #69
The source of the justification can vary. guillaumeb Feb 2019 #71
So which of those are immune to reason? Major Nikon Feb 2019 #72
What human is free from delusion? eom guillaumeb Feb 2019 #73
Some humans at least try. MineralMan Feb 2019 #74
And that attempt insures perfect insight? guillaumeb Feb 2019 #76
Only in your case, guillaumeb. MineralMan Feb 2019 #79
And you have revealed yourself. guillaumeb Feb 2019 #83
It at least provides the potential for correction Major Nikon Feb 2019 #81
Not many, but many are free of belief systems which require it. Major Nikon Feb 2019 #75
Or, that many think that they are free. guillaumeb Feb 2019 #77
At least you proved He was right Major Nikon Feb 2019 #78
You have the right to your belief. eom guillaumeb Feb 2019 #80
Which isn't required when one has facts Major Nikon Feb 2019 #82
In the interest of dialogue, please repest your question. eom guillaumeb Feb 2019 #84
72 Major Nikon Feb 2019 #85
No one is immune to or unable to reason. guillaumeb Feb 2019 #86
You didn't answer the question, again Major Nikon Feb 2019 #87
Patriotism was the claimed reason for dropping nuclear weapons on Japan. guillaumeb Feb 2019 #88
Who told you that? Major Nikon Feb 2019 #89
Really? Please demonstrate that. MineralMan Feb 2019 #90
The claimed reasons for dropping the bomb are many. guillaumeb Feb 2019 #91
The Nagasaki bomb may well have been unnecessary. MineralMan Feb 2019 #92
Patriotism is love of a concept. guillaumeb Feb 2019 #93
Your agreement is not required in any way. MineralMan Feb 2019 #94
Both are examples of tribalism. eom guillaumeb Feb 2019 #95
And so? Humans are tribal by nature. MineralMan Feb 2019 #97
Glad that you recognize that. guillaumeb Feb 2019 #100
Oh, for pete's sake, Guy. MineralMan Feb 2019 #101
An interesting, and some might say ironic, response. guillaumeb Feb 2019 #102
Patriotism... NeoGreen Feb 2019 #98
OK. However, bringing patriotism into a discussion about religion MineralMan Feb 2019 #99
What makes something "objectively wrong?" marylandblue Feb 2019 #52
In this case when it's something they claim helps and it doesn't Lordquinton Feb 2019 #56
All that does is push the idea of "wrong" onto other things thought be wrong marylandblue Feb 2019 #57
I don't quite understand Lordquinton Feb 2019 #58
I mean there is no objective right and wrong. nt marylandblue Feb 2019 #60
There is though Lordquinton Feb 2019 #62
You can show that the law did not meet it's stated goals marylandblue Feb 2019 #66
We can argue about all this all day Lordquinton Feb 2019 #68
You're supporting cooperation with the wall builder. Voltaire2 Feb 2019 #19
I am supporting building bridges, not walls. guillaumeb Feb 2019 #21
Oddly humorous considering that you are advocating cooperation with a fascist who wants to build Voltaire2 Feb 2019 #30
Write to your Democratic members of Congress. guillaumeb Feb 2019 #32
You may be revealing more than is wise, Guy. MineralMan Feb 2019 #35
And you? guillaumeb Feb 2019 #37
Just my thoughts, Guy. MineralMan Feb 2019 #38
It is a terrible idea. Act_of_Reparation Feb 2019 #42
The best thing Democrats can do in this regard... trotsky Feb 2019 #43
I agree with your excellent "advice" to Democrats. guillaumeb Feb 2019 #47
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Do we build walls, or bri...»Reply #78