Religion

Major Nikon

(36,899 posts)

19. If you're going to accuse me of ad hominem, you should have the integrity to explain yourself

Tue Nov 13, 2018, 11:30 PM

Nov 2018

Otherwise all you’re doing is making a half-fast unsupported claim as usual.

Meanwhile I’ve explained in detail why your personal attacks are nothing more than ad hominem. Instead of disputing you simply reply with a lame canned response, another ad hominem attack, or divert. I have no reason to suspect you’ll behave differently now even within your own thread where you self-righteously and hypocritically claim the high road.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

102 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

When it comes to religious belief, or lack of, name calling is not dialogue. [View all] guillaumeb Nov 2018 OP

I agree. I've come to understand that if I call an evangelical Christian a "Fundie," Still In Wisconsin Nov 2018 #1

Exactly. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #3

Is name-calling the same as labeling? Croney Nov 2018 #2

Name calling is denigration. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #4

Not if the name is accurate Major Nikon Nov 2018 #15

A bigot is intolerant. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #18

You just described when name calling isn't denigration Major Nikon Nov 2018 #21

What I said: guillaumeb Nov 2018 #22

You are working way too hard to be offended Major Nikon Nov 2018 #24

Dialogue for what? Cary Nov 2018 #5

Dialogue is multiple voices speaking. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #6

He is a racist and a homophobe trying to impose his relgion via politics Cary Nov 2018 #7

I doubt that I know the person, guillaumeb Nov 2018 #9

When they play insipid mind games and lie there can be no respect Cary Nov 2018 #14

I understand. eom guillaumeb Nov 2018 #17

Kinda sucks you don't follow your own advice Major Nikon Nov 2018 #8

Ths is one of your more enlightening ones: guillaumeb Nov 2018 #10

Kinda funny how you'd use your stalking tactics Major Nikon Nov 2018 #11

Afraid of your own words? guillaumeb Nov 2018 #12

When have I ever given you reason to believe that? Major Nikon Nov 2018 #13

Funny is you accusing me of doing what you did in a separate post. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #16

If you're going to accuse me of ad hominem, you should have the integrity to explain yourself Major Nikon Nov 2018 #19

Anyone looking at your replies to me will see the constant references to guillaumeb Nov 2018 #20

Bullshit Major Nikon Nov 2018 #23

Yes, your reply was indeed. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #28

Bullshit Major Nikon Nov 2018 #43

I don't see any name-calling in that post from 2014. MineralMan Nov 2018 #27

And the numerous other examples of name calling? guillaumeb Nov 2018 #29

Or perhaps less. MineralMan Nov 2018 #32

Try reading #23. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #34

No, thank you. Instead, please try MineralMan Nov 2018 #35

#23 is a prime illustration of the point of the thread. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #36

Oh, Guy... MineralMan Nov 2018 #37

You refuse to look at the proof before you. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #38

I read #23. Did you? MineralMan Nov 2018 #39

And what did you see in it? guillaumeb Nov 2018 #40

I saw something you should read for understanding. MineralMan Nov 2018 #41

Deflection. I understand. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #49

By other readers do you mean your imaginary fan club? Major Nikon Nov 2018 #44

Jesus's message covers this topic. Mariana Nov 2018 #25

Jesus probably never existed. Red Raider 85 Nov 2018 #26

The book exists. Mariana Nov 2018 #42

The topic is dialogue. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #30

Are you really claiming you don't insult others on a daily basis here? Major Nikon Nov 2018 #45

Surely not. MineralMan Nov 2018 #48

Hilariously so Major Nikon Nov 2018 #54

Yes, everyone knows the kind of dialog you want to see in this group. Mariana Nov 2018 #47

My own posts disprove your weak assertion. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #51

Poor, poor persecuted Gil. Mariana Nov 2018 #52

Poor deflecting on your part M. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #53

Bullshit Major Nikon Nov 2018 #61

Point to some. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #62

I will later Major Nikon Nov 2018 #64

I will wait for the later. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #67

I will not ignore your libel Major Nikon Nov 2018 #73

You need to research what libel is, and what constitutes evidence. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #74

Says the guy who doesn't know the difference between slander and libel Major Nikon Nov 2018 #77

Indeed. eom guillaumeb Nov 2018 #80

Here's a thread that just started, Guy. MineralMan Nov 2018 #68

You obviously misread the claim. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #71

Condescension from someone who's allegedly all about respectful dialog Major Nikon Nov 2018 #96

Several Major Nikon Nov 2018 #81

3 of your links are empty. Ironic, I think. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #82

All are active posters Major Nikon Nov 2018 #83

I asked fro a specific post, or posts, guillaumeb Nov 2018 #84

Moving the goal posts is a common tactic of those uninterested in civil discourse Major Nikon Nov 2018 #85

Your own claim. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #86

62. Point to some. Major Nikon Nov 2018 #87

#1 on your list is my own question asking for proof. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #88

I proved my assertion Major Nikon Nov 2018 #89

No, you failed, and now you wish to define failure as success. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #90

Not Major Nikon Nov 2018 #91

A wise decision. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #92

Not.... Major Nikon Nov 2018 #93

I complimented you on making a wise decision. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #94

I'll still wait patiently with the proof you reject good faith discussion Major Nikon Nov 2018 #95

Actually I don't even think he wants the first type Major Nikon Nov 2018 #63

Yes, of course. Gil's Groupies. Mariana Nov 2018 #65

The point of this OP is not clear.. Permanut Nov 2018 #31

Dialogue is not required. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #33

So don't do it Major Nikon Nov 2018 #46

Does the beam impede your vision? guillaumeb Nov 2018 #50

Displaying more of your alleged debate skills I see Major Nikon Nov 2018 #55

No, asking a legitimate question. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #57

Condescension is what passes for a legitimate question in your book? Major Nikon Nov 2018 #59

Does the entire tree trunk impede yours? MineralMan Nov 2018 #69

tu quoque fallacy in evidence. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #72

Tu quoque et tu quoque et tu quoque in infinitum... MineralMan Nov 2018 #75

Silliness indeed. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #78

18th Commandment violation Major Nikon Nov 2018 #56

There were only room for 11 on the tablets. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #58

Blasphemy doesn't suit you all that well Major Nikon Nov 2018 #60

Neither is performance art. Act_of_Reparation Nov 2018 #66

Par exemple? MineralMan Nov 2018 #70

Merci beaucoup, MineralMan. Mariana Nov 2018 #97

De rien... MineralMan Nov 2018 #99

No it isn't, yes it is Bradshaw3 Nov 2018 #76

Exactly. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #79

How about smearing everyone who disagrees with you as being part of a "choir"? trotsky Nov 2018 #98

Nothing applies, you see. Some people are sui generis, MineralMan Nov 2018 #101

Classic pattern of narcissists, too. trotsky Nov 2018 #102

There are lots of ways to avoid dialogue marylandblue Nov 2018 #100