Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Oh, that explains it. [View all]marylandblue
(12,344 posts)30. Whatever. Enjoy your political posturing.
And congratulations on adding the 25th post, which allowed more people to see this worthless thread.
Irony is not dead.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
Elmer Smith is similarly entertaining about mastodons and pterodactyls ---
struggle4progress
Sep 2018
#9
Your history seems wrong. It was questions raised earlier in the Age of Discovery
struggle4progress
Sep 2018
#32
Of course it raised questions! And if you ever peeked at any of the rabbinical commentaries on it,
struggle4progress
Sep 2018
#36
IMO Ken Ham is an attention whore who mostly deserves our studied neglect
struggle4progress
Sep 2018
#14
Now, there you go! And if there are enough rightwing judges, we can lose much more
struggle4progress
Sep 2018
#18
The worst consequences of those judges is that they are anti-democratic and biased towards the rich
struggle4progress
Sep 2018
#20
Who said science education is unimportant? I was raised in a scientific household,
struggle4progress
Sep 2018
#22
The thread actually seems to be about a 1905 children's book by Elmer Boyd Smith
struggle4progress
Sep 2018
#25