Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mainer

(12,162 posts)
2. The end result IS limiting of markets. With Amazon as the monopoly.
Mon Sep 17, 2012, 01:29 PM
Sep 2012

It's bad for authors and retailers and readers.

The agreement among the three publishers wasn't about limiting competition. Instead, Amazon is the one trying to put everyone out of business by underpricing books, putting retailers out of business, and destroying the print market. A publisher invests money in authors, editorial, marketing, graphics, to produce books -- and expects a profit. A very, very small margin of profit, btw. The publisher uses middlemen such as Amazon and BN and bookstores to sell that product.

Then Amazon prices the ebooks so cheaply that the other retailers go out of business (e.g. Borders.) You are left with a monopoly, the two-ton gorilla Amazon. The largest bookseller in the world. Soon to be one of the few remaining booksellers in the world.

This leads to LESS choice for all of us.

Okay, what does this mean to us as writers. [View all] Baitball Blogger Sep 2012 OP
I think the ruling is a good thing. sybylla Sep 2012 #1
The end result IS limiting of markets. With Amazon as the monopoly. mainer Sep 2012 #2
Don't disagree with you. But the solution shouldn't be illegal price fixing. sybylla Sep 2012 #3
Ridiculous WeekendWarrior Sep 2012 #4
Imagine a world with no publishers, no brick and mortar stores, and no print books mainer Sep 2012 #5
I'm going to make an educated guess that you're aware of this blog: kentauros Sep 2012 #6
I'm aware of Joe Konrath's blog. He's a smart guy. mainer Sep 2012 #9
Amazon gets to decide book prices kentauros Sep 2012 #12
Why is it self-published authors can set their prices and publishers can't? mainer Sep 2012 #13
I don't know why there's a difference. kentauros Sep 2012 #14
It's not about the prices set by publishers WeekendWarrior Sep 2012 #16
So if there's one other book for 99 cents, Amazon can price all books at 99 cents? mainer Sep 2012 #25
They don't WeekendWarrior Sep 2012 #29
Do you think the manufacturer of hammers WeekendWarrior Sep 2012 #18
Amazon undercuts prices at a loss... mainer Sep 2012 #20
Yes, they undercut prices WeekendWarrior Sep 2012 #27
How will libraries exist if publishers don't exist? mainer Sep 2012 #10
If you ever read Joe Konrath's blog, you'd know the answer to that question. kentauros Sep 2012 #11
Libraries will WeekendWarrior Sep 2012 #17
So you're fine with the extinction of print books. mainer Sep 2012 #21
I don think they'll ever be extinct WeekendWarrior Sep 2012 #28
Price fixing is illegal WeekendWarrior Sep 2012 #15
I never needed a day job. mainer Sep 2012 #24
Exceptions to the Rule WeekendWarrior Sep 2012 #26
This is complicated marions ghost Sep 2012 #7
There are plenty of 99 cent books you can buy. mainer Sep 2012 #8
Really? WeekendWarrior Sep 2012 #19
I get the strong feeling that I'm the only traditionally published writer posting here mainer Sep 2012 #22
It sounds like the pulp route is a very difficult process to break into. Baitball Blogger Sep 2012 #23
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Writing»Okay, what does this mean...»Reply #2