Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

highplainsdem

(53,631 posts)
7. Neil Clarke has said there aren't AI detectors that work well enough, but
Tue Feb 21, 2023, 09:25 PM
Feb 2023

there are some patterns he's noticed:

http://neil-clarke.com/a-concerning-trend/

I’m not going to detail how I know these stories are “AI” spam or outline any of the data I have collected from these submissions. There are some very obvious patterns and I have no intention of helping those people become less likely to be caught. Furthermore, some of the patterns I’ve observed could be abused and paint legitimate authors with the same brush. Regional trends, for example.


Maybe he's told other editors what to watch out for. I hope editors are sharing this info, but it's best not to make it public.

Here's an article from a month ago on how well various detector tools work:

https://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/how-to-detect-chatgpt-plagiarism/

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Writing»ChatGPT disaster: SF mag ...»Reply #7