Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DURHAM D

(32,869 posts)
2. That sounds correct - full retirement year
Sat Oct 5, 2013, 08:56 AM
Oct 2013

For several years they have been trying to get seniors turning 65 to go ahead and start-up their SS payments right away. This reduces your lifetime SS check by around 6% a year. However in your case your full retirement year is just a few months away so it should work out well.

When I turned 65 and called to enroll in Medicare they bounced me around to three different people trying to talk me into starting SS immediately. I think it is for their convenience of taking it directly from an SS check instead of processing mailed in payments plus, and this is a big plus, it also saves money for the SSA overtime if you take it early. btw - I had to pay Medicare quarterly in advance. I assume it is still the same.

I delayed my SS checks 2 years past my full retirement and it increased my amount by about 18% a month over what it would have been if I had taken SS the year I turned 65. So, if you or your husband are still working look at the benefit of delaying receipt of SS.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Support Forums»Seniors»Question about 100% Socia...»Reply #2