The RKBA v Tyranny

[jimmy the one]

37. rambling wreck

discntnt: The scope of Churchill's speech changes the meaning of his words and wisdom entirely. (sarcasm emogee)

With your sarcasm emogee, what are you trying to say thru your ambiguity?

discntnt: And obviously racists unilaterally lie and always speak foolishness. (sarcasm emogee)

I give up. You win the riddle me this contest.

discntn: Tell me this, are Churchill's words untrue, irrelevant or otherwise not applicable to this topic because of the scope of his address lacking sufficient overlap into this topic or because of his apparently racist remarks?

Churchill's racist remarks over the years, make this OP quote you posted of his, to be disingenuous to the international community & applicable mainly to, or only to, britain, in his opinion, since Churchill was quite happy with the british subjugation of India, and did not agree with her independence circa 1947.

British Relations with India and Subjugation of the Principal Indian Powers | 18th Century http://www.historydiscussion.net/british-india/british-relations-with-india-and-subjugation-of-the-principal-indian-powers-18th-century/692

the rambling wreck, of discontent: If either of these arguments hold water, why are they both necessary to your denial of what seems rather plain and simple? Further, perhaps you can show why the statement itself is untrue or foolish. Rather than simply attacking the source, maybe you have an actual argument??? Kind of smacks of some odd flavor Godwinism.
Hold the salad, hold the dressing.
With the truth, there is no messing.

Whee.