Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

jmg257

(11,996 posts)

2. "...going to run up the lawyers fees on both sides..." My thoughts too.

Reply to DonP (Reply #1)

Thu Apr 14, 2016, 09:44 PM

Apr 2016

Reading the complaint, I just can't see Bushmaster being held liable for practices of supplying & advertising products that legislators across the country, including CT, declare are perfectly legal.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

CT Judge denies manufacturer motion to dismiss in Sandy Hook case... [View all] jmg257 Apr 2016 OP

So not being thrown out of court is a "Major Win"? DonP Apr 2016 #1

"...going to run up the lawyers fees on both sides..." My thoughts too. jmg257 Apr 2016 #2

what PLCAA really means jimmy the one Apr 2016 #3

Setting aside the PLCAA TeddyR Apr 2016 #4

The suit alleges that Remington, aka Bushmaster, flamin lib Apr 2016 #9

That's what the complaint says TeddyR Apr 2016 #10

So ... Straw Man Apr 2016 #11

They hate the first amendment too, apparently. beevul Apr 2016 #5

To achieve every proposal sarisataka Apr 2016 #6

Whats sad... beevul Apr 2016 #7

Fixed that sarisataka Apr 2016 #8