Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)
4. statistically,
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 09:24 AM
Apr 2016

according to verifiable research, it would dramatically improve her odds. The suicide temptation would be nonsense, unless she is suicidal to begin with. There is a slimmer chance of collateral damage citizens than police. The average twelve year old that passed a hunter safety course is as well trained as NYPD.
Ambush is always possible, but self defense is a fundamental natural right, that includes the best means doing so. In fact, I would argue it is protected by the ninth amendment, just like abortion. Speaking of choice, it is her life and her or his choice. Some politician or pundit who has no clue about firearms, self defense training, criminology, or anything else on the issue has no business telling them what they should do. Some of them are not only ignorant, they are sexist.

It doesn't take much training to hit someone at close range who is trying to kill you. Training is always good, but spending hundreds to thousands of dollars in Gunsite isn't required.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Sorry you are against Duckhunter935 Apr 2016 #1
You're assuming that the outcome with a gun present would be good for domestic violence victim... Human101948 Apr 2016 #3
statistically, gejohnston Apr 2016 #4
Which reserach are you referring to? Human101948 Apr 2016 #8
several studies done by different criminologists over the past gejohnston Apr 2016 #9
Criminologists like Lott who base their conclusion on "estimates?" Human101948 Apr 2016 #11
Lott isn't a criminologist gejohnston Apr 2016 #12
Well, I still don't know who you're citing... Human101948 Apr 2016 #13
What course of action sarisataka Apr 2016 #5
Universal assumption. beardown Apr 2016 #6
According to the poster above training is unneccessary... Human101948 Apr 2016 #7
I didn't say it was unneccessary gejohnston Apr 2016 #10
re: "women are generally naturally better with firearms than men" discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2016 #18
"women are generally naturally better with firearms than men" DonP Apr 2016 #20
"...makes it less safe:" Any research to support this assertion? Eleanors38 Apr 2016 #15
No words for victims sarisataka Apr 2016 #17
Do you often run around telling people what's best for them with the force.of law? Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2016 #21
Wrong assumption. beevul Apr 2016 #22
They can still OC...if your life was on the line then OC should be fine. ileus Apr 2016 #2
I normally favor low-cost training and shall issue permits for carrying... Eleanors38 Apr 2016 #14
Really progressive of our governor TeddyR Apr 2016 #16
This message was self-deleted by its author CompanyFirstSergeant Apr 2016 #19
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Governor vetoes bill that...»Reply #4