Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
7. Oh jeez, not THIS idiotic idea again.
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 08:47 AM
Feb 2016

It's simple: the vast majority of the costs associated with harm caused with firearms result from actions which are not (and never will be) covered by insurance. All this idea does is create another wealth gate for (legal) firearms ownership, a profoundly anti-progressive notion.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Some folks seem entirely unable... discntnt_irny_srcsm Feb 2016 #1
So explain to the readers, SecMo, how an insurance company... krispos42 Feb 2016 #2
crickets, like normal Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #4
I'm honestly curious krispos42 Feb 2016 #6
All the knowledgeable people say "no, it is not coming". ManiacJoe Feb 2016 #3
No. Never. Not gonna happen. NT pablo_marmol Feb 2016 #5
Oh jeez, not THIS idiotic idea again. Lizzie Poppet Feb 2016 #7
It's never been about "covering costs" DonP Feb 2016 #8
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Gun Liability Insurance: ...»Reply #7