Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

benEzra

(12,148 posts)
3. Specifically, the suit alleges
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 11:10 AM
Feb 2016

that if a blithering idiot or someone *trying* to cause a negligent discharge partially disassembles the rifle with a round in the chamber, then forces the safety lever past its normal range of motion, this can disable this safety. Or, forcibly bending a part and permanently damaging the rifle in order to get the same thing to happen. That's crap.

I used to own a Century AK (SAR-1), which I posted about at length on DU. It had one of the most robust safety systems I've ever seen on a civilian rifle, much more secure than what you'll typically see on a bolt-action, lever-action, or a lot of pistols. It takes a very, very deliberate effort to move it off-safe.

Yes, this is frivolous, and claiming to represent AK owners as a "class" is ridiculous. Most of us would be dead-set against this contemptible lawsuit, which is very transparently intended to pull civilian AK's from the market.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

darn it Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #1
IMPOSSIBLE..... virginia mountainman Feb 2016 #2
Specifically, the suit alleges benEzra Feb 2016 #3
This is a fake post! And it isn't in GD! Eleanors38 Feb 2016 #4
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Century Arms Faces $5 Mil...»Reply #3