We've got several subposts though that aren't quite as potentially well-meaning as yours, and I can only see this going south in terms of constructive dialogue. As you may notice, very few (Read; none that I've seen) have answered to the second part of your post in relation to the articles that we haven't seen posted here. Rather than respond to each of those posts directly, I thought it would be more expedient and efficient to respond to the OP directly.
Consider the post I made less a response to you and more an acknowledgment of the trouble this could lead to. Gods know we're already a hunted species on this board; giving the other side potential alert-fuel isn't exactly something a few of us could afford.
Still, all that said, if this post makes it through the night, I'll throw a few articles I came across recently up for the board. Busy taking care of the baby girl at the moment, so intensive research and link-hunting are kind of out of the question tonight. 
Thanks for your time and consideration, mate. See you next time. o7
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
= new reply since forum marked as read