Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Green Manalishi

(1,054 posts)
5. Completely agree
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 10:59 AM
Jan 2016

There is a difference between being prepared to deal with a violent attack on one hand (an entirely rational thing; low probability where I happen to live thankfully) and wanting to play vigilante, Rambo or just looking for trouble on the other.

No desire to hurt another person. And to be honest, any material possession I have is not worth the taking of a human (or canine) life for.

However if someone is intending to harm me or my loved ones - and kicking in a door is about as much proof as anyone should need - then terminating their corporeal existence is justified and possibly necessary; but I sure as the hell would feel shitty about it for the rest of my life, no matter how horrible of a person they were.

I view my defensive preparations much as I do my fire insurance policy - really hope to hell they are NEVER needed, because even the best case scenario where they are would be traumatic and horrible for all concerned.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»One Dead After Reported H...»Reply #5