Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

beevul

(12,194 posts)
13. Hillary should talk to her husband.
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 01:23 AM
Jan 2016
"Everybody else has to be accountable, but not the gun manufacturers."


Ahem:

Statement on Signing the General Aviation Revitalization Act of 1994
August 17, 1994


I am pleased to sign into law S. 1458, the "General Aviation Revitalization Act of 1994." It is before me today as a result of bipartisan support in the Congress, and the hard work of many who have labored long to achieve passage of such legislation. The result is legislation that accommodates the need to revitalize our general aviation industry, while preserving the legal rights of passengers and pilots. This limited measure is intended to give manufacturers of general aviation aircraft and related component parts some protection from lawsuits alleging defective design or manufacture after an aircraft has established a lengthy record of operational safety.

In 1978, U.S. general aviation manufacturers produced 18,000 of these aircraft for domestic use and for export around the world. Our manufacturers were the world leaders in the production of general aviation aircraft. By 1993, production had dwindled to only 555 aircraft. As a result, in the last decade over 100,000 wellpaying jobs were lost in general aviation manufacturing. An innovative and productive American industry has been pushed to the edge of extinction. This Act will allow manufacturers to supply new basic aircraft for flight training, business use, and recreational flying.

The Act establishes an 18-year statute of repose for general aviation aircraft and component parts beyond which the manufacturer will not be liable in lawsuits alleging defective manufacture or design. It is limited to aircraft having a seating capacity of fewer than 20 passengers, which are not engaged in scheduled passengercarrying operations.

In its report to me and to the Congress last August, the National Commission to Ensure a Strong Competitive Airline Industry recommended the enactment of a statute of repose for general aviation aircraft. The report indicated that the enactment of such legislation would "help regenerate a once-healthy industry and help create thousands of jobs." I agree with this assessment; this is a job-creating and jobrestoring measure that will bring good jobs and economic growth back to this industry. It will also help U.S. companies restore our Nation to the status of the premier supplier of general aviation aircraft to the world, favorably affecting our balance of trade. Therefore, as I sign into law the "General Aviation Revitalization Act of 1994," I am pleased to acknowledge the bipartisan work done by the Congress and by all the supporters of the general aviation industry.

WILLIAM J. CLINTON

The White House, August 17, 1994.

NOTE: S. 1458, approved August 17, was assigned Public Law No. 103-298. Citation: William J. Clinton: "Statement on Signing the General Aviation Revitalization Act of 1994," August 17, 1994. Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley, The American Presidency Project. http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=48984.



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I'd have to do more research, SusanCalvin Jan 2016 #1
The law summarized by wiki discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2016 #3
There is a lot of misinformation on this topic. eomer Jan 2016 #29
Thank you. nt SusanCalvin Jan 2016 #30
thank you Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #31
Thanks discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2016 #32
especially since gejohnston Jan 2016 #2
Just the facts discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2016 #6
Bernie has read the current bill, and has his reasons --given how it's written-- to support it now. 99th_Monkey Jan 2016 #4
We'll be waiting n/t discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2016 #7
Me too. nt 99th_Monkey Jan 2016 #8
I think part of it might be the media story -- they are only too happy to keep plugging away at him JonLeibowitz Jan 2016 #5
To be honest... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2016 #9
This issue was raised in tonight's Democratic debate. Snobblevitch Jan 2016 #10
Imagine that discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2016 #16
Fuck the PLCAA and Fuck the NRA. (nt) stone space Jan 2016 #11
Just another content free expletive interjection. discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2016 #17
Makes you wonder which particular NRA people he finds that attractive? DonP Jan 2016 #24
I guess time flies when you work hard to offend folks. discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2016 #25
With all that "fucking" going on, I think I'll lay low for a while. Eleanors38 Jan 2016 #34
I think he has a serious thing for Wayne and his ties. DonP Jan 2016 #35
Why do arms manufacturers attack the families of gun victims and try to bankrupt them? stone space Jan 2016 #12
Why does the Brady Campaign branford Jan 2016 #14
The pro-control reaction to the results of such lawsuits are like... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2016 #21
Not only that... Puha Ekapi Jan 2016 #22
I know, that is the sick part Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #26
Barratry discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2016 #33
Why does anyone file a frivolous lawsuit and expect no reaction... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2016 #18
It wasn't frivolous. But you knew that already. (nt) stone space Jan 2016 #19
Yes it was/is and... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2016 #20
They knew the law would not allow the suit. It was in black and white. nt hack89 Jan 2016 #23
and it really was Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #27
Hillary should talk to her husband. beevul Jan 2016 #13
Another interesting and comparable statute is the branford Jan 2016 #15
but we have always been told Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #28
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»The PLCAA; Is Bernie foll...»Reply #13