Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

rjsquirrel

(4,762 posts)
16. Absurd
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 10:41 AM
Jan 2016

You will note that your car insurance and homeowners insurance both cover medical bills caused by your liabilities. In such circumstances a person's individual medical insurance is not obligated to pay your liability.

Or are you saying liability insurance on a car is not necessary since everyone has great medical coverage?


This is a stupid thread. Special pleading won't make you right. Your liability extends far beyond medical care if you shoot someone accidentally or someone gets hurt with your gun because you didn't secure it properly. You could be out for lost income, property damage, and pain and suffering to the tune of millions. You are the one reducing it to "medical" expenses.

Look at your car insurance. It requires you to take reasonable precautions to limit the liability risk of your car. It is the answer to a lot of problems with careless and stupid gun owners.

Your car insurance requires you to get your car inspected and registered every year (or two depending on state). It gives you discounts for auto theft prevention technology or parking in a garage. It covers far more than medical liability. But if you drive drunk or loan your car to an unlicensed driver IT DOESN'T PAY and you are on the hook for the millions it will cost if you kill someone's kids with your stupidity.

Why should I, as a medical insurance customer, have to pay more to cover your gun liability, socialized to the general population, if you won't lock your gun up or you loan it to your depressed friend? I don't have to carry your car insurance risk, you pay a premium based on your actual liability risk.

This OP and the gun nut defensiveness in some replies reveal zero understanding of how insurance works, or why it works so well for cars (inarguably it is the inshrance industry -- not the govt. -- which has so drastically driven down accident deaths in recent years by incentivizing or requiring safer cars and driving).

Done arguing with people who deny facts that don't suit their ideology. But to repeat I am a gun-owning hunter, and I carry liability insurance in part to cover my risks therefrom.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Liability insurance is not an answer [View all] discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2016 OP
Anyone with a basic understanding TeddyR Jan 2016 #1
No rjsquirrel Jan 2016 #5
So how would that work? discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2016 #6
No rjsquirrel Jan 2016 #7
Wouldn't medical insurance cover medical treatment of accidental injuries? n/t discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2016 #8
Yes it would, he's just pushing the gun control insurance meme. eom. GGJohn Jan 2016 #9
Not necessarily rjsquirrel Jan 2016 #10
And since health insurance is already mandated... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2016 #13
Absurd rjsquirrel Jan 2016 #16
What I am saying discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2016 #32
re: "Your car insurance requires you to get your car inspected and registered every year..." discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2016 #33
re: "You are the one reducing it to "medical" expenses." discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2016 #34
re: "Done arguing with people who deny facts that don't suit their ideology." discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2016 #35
Gun control proponents so often target statistically tiny categories. Lizzie Poppet Jan 2016 #41
The list is incredible... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2016 #42
It was nice hearing from you discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2016 #58
Of course that's not the point of gun insurance anyway DonP Jan 2016 #14
If your gun was actually stolen, branford Jan 2016 #43
How much does sarisataka Jan 2016 #12
It fits in with the punish the innocent mindset, 2A regressives are known for. ileus Jan 2016 #2
How is insurance punishment? rjsquirrel Jan 2016 #4
Right because rjsquirrel Jan 2016 #3
What percentage of negligient discharge injuries involve a victim that would not be covered Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2016 #11
"a huge number of gun deaths and accidents result from well intentioned gun owners being careless" Lizzie Poppet Jan 2016 #27
$10,000 penalty if found to not have liability insurance. Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2016 #15
How do they find out rjsquirrel Jan 2016 #17
For that to happen, registration would have to be implemented, GGJohn Jan 2016 #18
When you buy a gun you buy rjsquirrel Jan 2016 #19
The difference being that owning a firearm is a right, while driving or owning a vehicle isn't. GGJohn Jan 2016 #20
Oh this again rjsquirrel Jan 2016 #21
Well, considering we outright own our property and home, GGJohn Jan 2016 #22
Debunked rjsquirrel Jan 2016 #23
LOL, shows what you know, GGJohn Jan 2016 #25
He meant your erroneous interpretation of the militia clause has been debunked. Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2016 #28
Thank you, that is what I meant. eom. GGJohn Jan 2016 #30
No, the entire sentence has been correctly interpreted. Lizzie Poppet Jan 2016 #31
Making some pro-control folks understand that... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2016 #37
Casuistry rjsquirrel Jan 2016 #51
According to the SCOTUS, the President, the Democratic Party, GGJohn Jan 2016 #55
I'm pretty sure it's only "Settled Law" or "Law of the Land" if they agree with it DonP Jan 2016 #57
R.I.F. Lizzie Poppet Jan 2016 #56
"A clause in the US constitution has not been debunked." beevul Jan 2016 #46
"Just like cars." beevul Jan 2016 #45
If I let my automobile insurance lapse S_B_Jackson Jan 2016 #48
all I can say is Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #50
You can only be checked if you are stopped and you can only be stopped for an underlying reason. Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2016 #24
Ideological purity uber alles n/t discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2016 #36
I just wish Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2016 #39
I began this thread as a result of... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2016 #40
Despite their claims, 'X' isn't their goal. beevul Jan 2016 #47
And yet, they seem so comfortable with such blatant dishonesty. Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2016 #49
"Fie on ’t, ah fie!" discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2016 #52
But they spew Hemenway and gladly so while none of us spew Nugent. Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2016 #53
It's not difficult for me to question what I think before I say it. discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2016 #54
Your certainly might not like it, branford Jan 2016 #44
Let me explain what I think is the pro-control plan discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2016 #26
And a poor tax imposed on a right. Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2016 #29
The poor tax would be... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2016 #38
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Liability insurance is no...»Reply #16