Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)

21. There won't be any bridge to cross, the pre-emption law is pretty clear on that. eom.

Reply to MariaThinks (Reply #19)

Mon Jan 11, 2016, 07:48 PM

Jan 2016

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

36 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

City considers fee for guns, ammunition [View all] SecularMotion Jan 2016 OP

A sin tax is a great idea. JonathanRackham Jan 2016 #1

+1 jonno99 Jan 2016 #27

good for the stores Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #2

Don't the politicians realize the costs of free speech and assembly. branford Jan 2016 #3

drive to the nearest walturd and LGS outside city limits. ileus Jan 2016 #4

this is good. MariaThinks Jan 2016 #5

Except for the fact... Puha Ekapi Jan 2016 #6

it will raise money MariaThinks Jan 2016 #9

We already pay our rightful share. eom. GGJohn Jan 2016 #11

no it will not Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #18

well let's cross that bridge when we get to it. MariaThinks Jan 2016 #19

There won't be any bridge to cross, the pre-emption law is pretty clear on that. eom. GGJohn Jan 2016 #21

Remember when Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2016 #23

What prevents a St. Pete resident from driving to the nearest S_B_Jackson Jan 2016 #28

What makes you think this is good? GGJohn Jan 2016 #8

Nothing wrong in having gun owners may their rightful share and nobody MariaThinks Jan 2016 #10

We already pay our rightful share, GGJohn Jan 2016 #12

that tough law isn't working so it needs to be augmented. MariaThinks Jan 2016 #14

Well, the FL. legislature doesn't think so GGJohn Jan 2016 #20

Nobody here, except you, has said anything about taking firearms away. eom GGJohn Jan 2016 #13

i just wanted to offer my reassurance for maintaining gun rights MariaThinks Jan 2016 #15

Yeah, somehow, I don't think that was your motive for the post, eom GGJohn Jan 2016 #16

you can't read my mind MariaThinks Jan 2016 #17

Florida has a pretty tough pre-emption law with stiff penalties attached, GGJohn Jan 2016 #7

who will get to pay those "stiff penalties" virginia mountainman Jan 2016 #22

According to FL. law, the local legislatures who try to implement the law GGJohn Jan 2016 #24

GOOD! virginia mountainman Jan 2016 #25

Why go through all the trouble? Why not just make it illegal to commit violent acts with a gun? jonno99 Jan 2016 #26

that should be illegal Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #29

Well let's get crackin! Then all we'll need is more gun-free zones jonno99 Jan 2016 #30

any day now we should start Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #31

Hmmm...I'm not feeling the enthusiasm I was hoping for... jonno99 Jan 2016 #32

lol Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #33

Good!! deathrind Jan 2016 #34

Not going to happen, GGJohn Jan 2016 #35

In addition to GG's #35, you "can't tax hell out of" a constitutional right... Eleanors38 Jan 2016 #36