Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

branford

(4,462 posts)
5. No, it will not.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 09:47 PM
Jan 2016

It's an ATF regulation, no EO, and requires a full comment period and compliance with the Administrative Procedure Act and all other applicable laws and regulations.

In fact, since the original proposed regulation included the discretionary CLEO sign-off, and it was ultimately dropped, the BATFE likely believed it wouldn't survive legal challenge, particularly in light of the fact that most federal circuits have now struck down similar "may issue" firearm regulations (with the notable exception of NY, CT and VT in the 2nd Circuit). Given the low number of owned NFA weapons subject to the regulation and the lack of any crimes or accidents with them, realizing that "shall issue" vs. "may issue" laws are ripe for Supreme Court review, and not wanting to further antagonize Congress when the president is requesting more funding for the politically unpopular BATFE, the agency wisely chose not to push their luck (and do something they could cite to pro-gun Congressmen and Senators).



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Obama's EAs included a hu...»Reply #5