Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

shadowrider

(4,941 posts)
6. He was influential enough to get it taken care of
Thu Dec 10, 2015, 07:53 PM
Dec 2015

Joe Schmuck on the other hand is sh*t out of luck.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

there's one saturnsring Dec 2015 #1
Thanks for letting us know that you support the Bush era secret govt lists. eom. GGJohn Dec 2015 #12
im anti child killing but you already knew this -in response i could say saturnsring Dec 2015 #14
Do you even know how someone ends up on those lists? GGJohn Dec 2015 #15
yes that should be fixed - but that doesnt change my opinion on this saturnsring Dec 2015 #17
So you're all for denial of due process because of GUNS? GGJohn Dec 2015 #18
im all for doing something about the gun problem we have here saturnsring Dec 2015 #20
"doing something"? virginia mountainman Dec 2015 #22
Ok, you just answered my question. GGJohn Dec 2015 #23
When fascism comes to the US, it will arrive curled in the fetal position and demanding "SECURITY!" dairydog91 Dec 2015 #25
What a waste of time yeoman6987 Dec 2015 #26
Bravo DebbieCDC Dec 2015 #2
See post #12. eom. GGJohn Dec 2015 #13
Subscribing to the Bush-Cheney, Inc. methodology. Eleanors38 Dec 2015 #3
Nothing like tying a civil liberty to a secret list... with ZERO recourse too the innocent. virginia mountainman Dec 2015 #4
IIRC Ted Kennedy spent time on the no-fly list n/t discntnt_irny_srcsm Dec 2015 #5
He was influential enough to get it taken care of shadowrider Dec 2015 #6
That will be met with a "due process" suit rather quickly. ManiacJoe Dec 2015 #7
problem is standing Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #8
Yes, that will slow down the suit initially. ManiacJoe Dec 2015 #9
Won't be that hard to find someone from CT, who knows they have... virginia mountainman Dec 2015 #11
So, another Democrat in favor of the Bush era secret govt. lists, GGJohn Dec 2015 #10
Once upon a time, sarisataka Dec 2015 #16
Eugene, does "Anything you can do, I can do better" sum up Democrats NOW? Eleanors38 Dec 2015 #19
If you are a suspected terrorist DirtDart1319 Dec 2015 #21
You are certainly too dangerous to be allowed in a Planned Parenthood clinic! dairydog91 Dec 2015 #24
No one on the (formerly Bush/Cheney) watch list should be allowed to vote either of course DonP Dec 2015 #28
How do they know who is on the list? oneshooter Dec 2015 #27
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Connecticut to limit acce...»Reply #6