Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

(17,502 posts)

5. we know, but not relevant

Thu Dec 10, 2015, 05:56 PM

Dec 2015

the issue is Bush's list of names.
https://www.aclu.org/news/court-rules-no-fly-list-process-unconstitutional-and-must-be-reformed

If we are talking about DiFi's bill, the no fly list isn't really relevant either since the bill would give the AG the authority to add any name based on reasonable suspicion.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The ACLU agrees with the NRA and Paul Ryan about terror watch/no fly lists [View all] friendly_iconoclast Dec 2015 OP

wouldnt that same logic mean the no-fly list is also unconstitutional? saturnsring Dec 2015 #1

yes it is and gejohnston Dec 2015 #2

thanks saturnsring Dec 2015 #3

ACLU position on the Second Amendment safeinOhio Dec 2015 #4

we know, but not relevant gejohnston Dec 2015 #5