Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
41. But, they take it so seriously. Followed by "no one wants to take your guns©."
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 03:34 PM
Nov 2015


I'm firmly convinced prohibition is our most addictive social policy.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Try to be helpful these days. yeoman6987 Nov 2015 #1
"he grabbed a handgun and ran after the suspects." SecularMotion Nov 2015 #2
LOL - Looks like we reached the same conclusion. nt procon Nov 2015 #5
It has been established sarisataka Nov 2015 #7
Looks like Texas is a bad place to be a criminal. FLson Nov 2015 #9
Actually, that is legal in California gejohnston Nov 2015 #11
It is perfectly legal to pursue escaping robbers, with or without possession of a firearm, branford Nov 2015 #12
He "ran after the suspects" in order shoot them. procon Nov 2015 #3
Oh, so you were there? GGJohn Nov 2015 #10
I'm sure your own fictionalized speculation is absolutely correct. procon Nov 2015 #13
He only shot AFTER the POS turned to confront him. GGJohn Nov 2015 #15
Why, that sounds like the same excuse George Zimmerman used, so it must be OK. nt procon Nov 2015 #16
LOL. GGJohn Nov 2015 #17
Odd, but when I think about gun violence, humor is not the first thing that comes to mind. procon Nov 2015 #18
Odd, I don't remember laughing about firearm violence, which, BTW, GGJohn Nov 2015 #19
so, not only are you saying that gejohnston Nov 2015 #20
Running down the robbers after they left and no longer posed a threat, procon Nov 2015 #21
If the robbers drove away, it would still be perfectly legal to pursue them branford Nov 2015 #23
Are you actually trying to argue it was self defense to run after them and shoot them down? procon Nov 2015 #26
No, you're not right. branford Nov 2015 #29
You are laboring under illusions... Eleanors38 Nov 2015 #34
No the excuse Zimmerman used.. virginia mountainman Nov 2015 #22
That happened after Zimmerman tracked him and accosted him. procon Nov 2015 #24
According to the evidenced adduced at trial, branford Nov 2015 #25
The sad truth is, that virginia mountainman Nov 2015 #27
not self defense, he pursued them just so he could shoot them mwrguy Nov 2015 #4
He didn't shoot sarisataka Nov 2015 #8
It's perfectly legal to pursue escaping thieves. branford Nov 2015 #14
Prove he did it virginia mountainman Nov 2015 #28
What?! And stop a newly-concocted Narrative™ in its tracks? I won't hear of this. Eleanors38 Nov 2015 #36
So much for the myth of the law abiding gun controller. Nuclear Unicorn Nov 2015 #43
Correction: The violent Thugs are in jail. Eleanors38 Nov 2015 #35
One life possibly saved, and millions dead over the last hundred years. FLson Nov 2015 #6
Two men TeddyR Nov 2015 #30
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2015 #31
I have no idea what you are talking about TeddyR Nov 2015 #32
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2015 #33
So, directly calling someone "racist" is now a package deal with NRA Talking point? Eleanors38 Nov 2015 #38
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2015 #40
But, they take it so seriously. Followed by "no one wants to take your guns©." Eleanors38 Nov 2015 #41
So, any rebuttal to your "reasoning" isssss an NRA "talk point?" Eleanors38 Nov 2015 #37
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2015 #39
I now bowel down. Eleanors38 Nov 2015 #42
bad, bad man with a gun... ileus Nov 2015 #44
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»SAPD: Man defends girlfri...»Reply #41