Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: SAPD: Man defends girlfriend; shoots robbery suspects [View all]branford
(4,462 posts)25. According to the evidenced adduced at trial,
Zimmerman may have followed Martin because he believed him engaged in criminality (although the evidence also indicated he stopped the pursuit prior to the altercation). Martin purportedly attacked Zimmerman just for following him, and more importantly, Zimmerman did not employ lethal force, i.e, fire his gun, until after Martin was slamming his head against the ground.
I would suggest you become familiar with the laws about what is generally permissible on public property, as well as the laws of self-defense in your jurisdiction and others. When discussing criminal matters where a trial has actually occurred, it is also prudent to rely on actual evidence in any discussion, rather than belief, hope and bias.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It is perfectly legal to pursue escaping robbers, with or without possession of a firearm,
branford
Nov 2015
#12
Why, that sounds like the same excuse George Zimmerman used, so it must be OK. nt
procon
Nov 2015
#16
Odd, but when I think about gun violence, humor is not the first thing that comes to mind.
procon
Nov 2015
#18
Are you actually trying to argue it was self defense to run after them and shoot them down?
procon
Nov 2015
#26
What?! And stop a newly-concocted Narrative™ in its tracks? I won't hear of this.
Eleanors38
Nov 2015
#36
So, directly calling someone "racist" is now a package deal with NRA Talking point?
Eleanors38
Nov 2015
#38
But, they take it so seriously. Followed by "no one wants to take your guns©."
Eleanors38
Nov 2015
#41