Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

spooky3

(36,751 posts)
2. Per the two leading etiquette experts, Miss Manners and Emily Post, this
Wed Apr 24, 2024, 10:59 AM
Apr 2024

is incorrect. The original Miss Manners was also chief of protocol in the US govt in the 1960s. I don’t know who would be a more reliable authority on this.

The rationale is that, because there is only one President at a given time, s/he is the only one who should be addressed by that title. In contrast, there are multiple Senators, Governors, etc., at a given time, so there is no confusion or disrespect, if we also address a former office holder by that title.

One can find their statements about this online. For example:

https://www.uexpress.com/life/miss-manners/2003/12/02

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Languages and Linguistics»Who gets to be called Mis...»Reply #2