Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unblock

(54,515 posts)
3. i always assumed either it was always intended to be a complementary product
Tue May 21, 2019, 01:19 PM
May 2019

i.e., that the plan from the get-go was to temporarily "replace" real coke with new coke, then after the inevitable clamoring, reintroduce real coke (classic coke) with another pre-planned ad campaign, and then sell both products side-by-side.

i guess it played out that way for a while, but it wasn't until later that i was convinced it was not at all planned that way.


to this day i remain baffled as to why coca-cola would have majorly messed with a product that people consume *largely out of habit*. consistency is the name of the game here.

did the test-marketing results just give them really, really bad insights into how new coke would perform??

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Netflix, Streaming Videos & DVDs »Coca-Cola Will Revive New...»Reply #3