Neoma, you need to resign as host of this form, right now.

[jberryhill]

16. Verdict on the OP

ALERTER'S COMMENTS:

This post directly calls out and criticizes another DUer.



You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Feb 14, 2012, 08:19 AM, and the Jury voted 3-3 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: This group is having an issue with host appointments. Stifling discussion of the group's governance controversy by labeling criticism of the host, by calling it a "call out", is an attempt to stifle criticism of the host, which is the very point of the controversy. This group needs to work this issue out and, yes, it will involve posts which are about the people in question.

Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT and said: I wish I knew the back story here. If the alleged behavior indeed took place, then a resignation would seem to be in order. However, it is impossible to construe the post as anything other than a call-out, and I voted accordingly.

Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Right now, I don't think there's a way to discuss this in public other than by a post such as this. For that reason, I'm going to vote to let this stand. In the future, if other ways of reviewing the performance of a host are created, I may vote differently.

Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given

Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT and said: Completely inappropriate.

Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: I'm not sure how else this matter can be resolved if it can't be discussed by members of the Feminist Group. There has to be a way to address an issue with a host who is viewed as unethical or unfair.